Key result
Genetically predicted uncontrolled SBP linked to ~25% higher type 2 diabetes risk vs controlled patterns.
Why the study?
To evaluate the causal association between blood pressure and type 2 diabetes, and assess the cumulative effect of genetic predisposition to high blood pressure or glycemic levels in Korea.
Does genetically determined high blood pressure increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in Korean middle-aged individuals?
Observational (n=8,510)
Does genetically determined high blood pressure increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in Korean middle-aged individuals?
Effect estimate: HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.00-1.58)
Absolute Event Rate: 193.99% vs 58.17%
There is a bidirectional causality between high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes in the Korean middle-aged population, suggesting that cumulative high blood pressure predisposition increases T2D risk.
Genetically predicted uncontrolled SBP associated with higher T2D risk; leaves open whether BP control modifies diabetes incidence.
This study aims to evaluate the causal association of blood pressure (BP) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and assess the cumulative effect of genetic predisposition of high BP or glycemic for future clinical in Korea. To assess the bidirectional causal association between fasting blood sugar (FBS) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the large biobank, five MR methods (a 2-stage least squares (2SLS) regression, inverse-variance weighted (IVW), 2 median-based (simple and weighted) and MR-Egger) were applied using the weighted genetic risk score (wGRS). A bidirectional causality was found in all five methods, and there was no horizontal pleiotropy. Using the 2SLS regression method, genetically determined 10 mm/Hg elevation of SBP caused an increased 0.63 mmol/L FBS (p < 0.0001). Men had a particularly strong bidirectional causal relationship. Distinct predicted trajectories based on genetically determined SBP and FBS levels were identified using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM). To assess the risk of subsequent hypertension or T2D in each trajectory, the Cox proportional hazard model, and adjusted covariates (including wGRS) were conducted. An uncontrol predicted SBP pattern (fluctuated plot) had a higher risk of subsequence T2D than a control-predicted pattern (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.00-1.58). In the Korean middle-aged, it was significantly demonstrated that there is a bidirectional causality between high BP and T2D, which is different from previous studies in Europe. Specially, cumulative high blood pressure predisposition by the genetic variants may affect to risk of T2D incidence. Prevention of high BP must be followed in lifespan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeon et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes (n=8,510). Uncontrolled predicted systolic blood pressure pattern (genetic predisposition) vs. Controlled predicted systolic blood pressure pattern was evaluated on Subsequent type 2 diabetes incidence (per 1000 person-years) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.58). An uncontrolled predicted systolic blood pressure pattern based on genetic variants was associated with a higher risk of subsequent type 2 diabetes compared to a controlled pattern (HR 1.25).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: