Why the study?
The impact of meeting intensive blood pressure targets on renal function remains unclear, and the early decline in GFR associated with antihypertensive therapies and strict BP targets raises concerns.
What is the clinical significance of early GFR decline in response to antihypertensive treatment or strict BP targets in patients with hypertension and CKD?
What is the clinical significance of early GFR decline in response to antihypertensive treatment or strict BP targets in patients with hypertension and CKD?
This review highlights the need to balance the long-term nephroprotective and cardiovascular benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering against the clinical concern of early GFR decline in patients with CKD.
Early GFR decline should not prompt ACEi/ARB discontinuation in CKD; leaves open optimal BP targets for long-term outcomes.
Hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely linked pathological processes. Combating high blood pressure (BP) is an essential part of preventing CKD progression and reducing cardiovascular (CV) risk. Data from recent randomized controlled trials on patients at high CV risk showed the beneficial effects of intensive action to meet BP targets on mortality related to CV disease. The impact of meeting such targets on renal function is still unclear, however, particularly for patients with CKD. This issue has been the object of several post hoc analyses because lowering BP definitely has a nephroprotective role, but the early decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) associated with antihypertensive therapies and strict BP targets is still a concern in nephrology clinical practice. The present review discusses the results of studies on this topic, focusing specifically on the clinical significance of early GFR decline in response to treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, or to different BP targets, in terms of renal and CV outcomes, and how this tips the balance towards continuing or discontinuing antihypertensive therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Signorini et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: