Key result
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is as common as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and carries a high mortality rate, yet currently lacks specific evidence-based therapies.
Highlights the rising prevalence of HFpEF and the urgent need for unified diagnostic criteria and targeted therapies.
HFpEF matches HFrEF prevalence and mortality without targeted therapies; leaves open unified diagnostics and dedicated trials.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has recently emerged as a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Contrary to initial beliefs, HFpEF is now known to be as common as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and carries an unacceptably high mortality rate. With a prevalence that has been steadily rising over the past two decades, it is very likely that HFpEF will represent the dominant heart failure phenotype over the coming few years. The scarcity of trials in this semi-discrete form of heart failure and lack of unified enrolment criteria in the studies conducted to date might have contributed to the current absence of specific therapies. Understanding the epidemiological, pathophysiological and molecular differences (and similarities) between these two forms of heart failure is cornerstone to the development of targeted therapies. Carefully designed studies that adhere to unified diagnostic criteria with the recruitment of appropriate controls and adoption of practical end-points are urgently needed to help identify effective treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ElGuindy et al. (2012) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is as common as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and carries a high mortality rate, yet currently lacks specific evidence-based therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: