Key result
Preserved left ventricular function in heart failure patients was associated with a poor long-term survival rate that was not significantly different from patients with reduced function (HR 1.16).
Why the study?
Does preserved left ventricular function compared to reduced left ventricular function improve long-term survival in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
Cohort (n=309)
No
Does preserved left ventricular function compared to reduced left ventricular function improve long-term survival in patients hospitalized with heart failure?
The long-term clinical outcome of patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular function is poor and not significantly different from those with reduced left ventricular function.
HFpEF survival is as poor as HFrEF; leaves open whether phenotype-specific therapies improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis. The proportion of patients with HF and preserved left ventricular function (LVF) is increasing. Long term prognosis of HF with preserved LVF may not be so benign. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long term clinical outcome of patients with HF and preserved LVF and predictors of outcome. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 309 patients hospitalized with a definite clinical diagnosis of HF. Patients were followed for a mean of 6.5 years for clinical outcome. RESULTS: More than a third (36%) of the patients had preserved systolic LVF based on echocardiography. The long term survival rate in this group was poor and not significantly different from patients with reduced LVF (28% vs 23% respectively, P=0.2). The adjusted survival rate by Cox regression analysis was also not significantly different (hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.55, P=0.31). The event free survival from death or heart failure re-hospitalization was also low in both groups and not significantly different between patients with preserved vs. reduced LVF (12% vs. 10% respectively, P=0.2). Predictors of mortality in patients with preserved LVF were age, functional capacity and serum urea levels. CONCLUSIONS: The long term clinical outcome of patients with heart failure and preserved LVF is poor and not significantly different from patients with reduced LVF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gotsman et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=309). Preserved left ventricular function vs. Reduced left ventricular function was evaluated on Long-term survival rate (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.87-1.55, p=0.31). Preserved left ventricular function in heart failure patients was associated with a poor long-term survival rate that was not significantly different from patients with reduced function (HR 1.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: