PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1993Circulation200 citationsOpen Access

Prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease. An investigation of differences in outcome between the sexes according to initial coronary disease presentation.

View Full Paper
JMJoanne M. MurabitoJEJane C. EvansMLMartin G. Larson

Structured PICO

Does prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease differ between men and women according to initial presentation?

P
Population
1,333 subjects from the Framingham Heart Study with the onset of new nonfatal clinically apparent coronary disease from 1951 through 1986 (750 men, mean age 63 years; 583 women, mean age 67 years).
O
Outcome
Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and overall mortality according to initial coronary disease presentationhard clinical

Women have a worse or similar prognosis compared to men after a recognized myocardial infarction, but a more favorable outlook after the onset of angina or unrecognized MI, partly due to event misclassification.

Limitations

  • Greater misclassification of coronary events in women than in men

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences exist between men and women in prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: All Framingham Heart Study subjects with the onset of clinically apparent coronary disease from 1951 through 1986 were studied to compare prognosis in men and women according to CHD presentation. Coronary disease presentations included angina, coronary insufficiency (unstable angina), recognized myocardial infarction, unrecognized myocardial infarction, and coronary death. Less than 1% of subjects were lost to follow-up for overall mortality. Cox modeling was used to examine the sex differences in outcome for each coronary presentation. New nonfatal coronary disease developed in 750 men (mean age, 63 years) and 583 women (mean age, 67 years). After onset of angina, men were at greater risk than women for myocardial infarction (hazards ratio HR, 2.20; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.45 to 3.34) and coronary death (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.36) after adjustment for age and coronary disease risk factors. After a recognized myocardial infarction, there was a trend toward greater risk for overall mortality in women than men after adjustment for age and risk factors (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.08). In contrast, after an unrecognized myocardial infarction, men were at increased risk for death compared with women (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.15). CONCLUSIONS: Women fare at least as poorly as men after recognized myocardial infarction, whereas women have a more favorable outlook than men after the onset of angina or unrecognized myocardial infarction. The favorable outcome in women after angina and unrecognized myocardial infarction is due, in part, to greater misclassification of these coronary events in women than in men.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murabito et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f0a6ae29b511e9f2297c0https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2548
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper