Key result
Eplerenone reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild systolic heart failure already receiving high doses of ACEi/ARB and beta-blockers (HR 0.59).
Why the study?
Does eplerenone reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild symptoms of systolic heart failure already receiving optimal best practice background drug therapy?
RCT (n=2,737)
Does eplerenone reduce cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild symptoms of systolic heart failure already receiving optimal best practice background drug therapy?
Effect estimate: HR 0.59
Eplerenone provides consistent clinical benefits in patients with mild systolic heart failure, even when they are already receiving high target doses of ACE inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers.
Supports eplerenone addition in mild systolic HF on high-dose ACEi/ARB and beta-blockers; extends prior evidence to optimized background therapy.
Background— In EMPHASIS-HF (Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure), eplerenone significantly reduced major cardiovascular events versus placebo in 2737 patients with mild symptoms of heart failure and an ejection fraction of <35%, in addition to recommended therapy. However, it is not known whether such benefits were preserved in patients receiving optimal background drug therapy, that is, high doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi, or angiotensin receptor blocker), β-blocker, or both drug classes. Methods and Results— We further analyzed EMPHASIS-HF according to the use and dose of these background drug classes. Patients receiving ≥50% of target dose were considered to be receiving high doses; patients on <50% or no drug comprised the low-dose group. The primary end point of the study (cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization), as well as all-cause mortality, was evaluated in this way. The beneficial clinical effects of eplerenone (as observed in the main study) were preserved for the EMPHASIS-HF primary end point in patients receiving higher doses of ACEi or angiotensin receptor blocker, β-blocker, or both (hazard ratio for eplerenone versus placebo, ACEi/angiotensin receptor blocker: high dose, 0.67; low dose, 0.65; β-blockers: high dose, 0.55; low dose, 0.72; both ACEi/angiotensin receptor blocker and β-blocker: high dose, 0.59; low dose, 0.68; P value for interaction 0.80, 0.15, and 0.53, respectively), as well as for all-cause mortality. There were no major safety issues, except a borderline increased risk of hypotension with eplerenone in those on high-dose ACEi or ACEi/β-blocker. Conclusions— Eplerenone provides substantial benefit on major events (with an acceptable safety profile) in patients with mild symptoms of systolic heart failure, even in those already receiving high doses of standard background therapies. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00232180.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krum et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Mild symptoms of systolic heart failure (n=2,737). Eplerenone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.59). Eplerenone reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild systolic heart failure already receiving high doses of ACEi/ARB and beta-blockers (HR 0.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: