Why the study?
Anticoagulant therapy to prevent thromboembolism in older adults requires balancing risks and benefits, which is particularly challenging in the very elderly who face higher risks of both bleeding and thrombosis.
What are the challenges of implementing and managing anticoagulant therapy in older patients?
What are the challenges of implementing and managing anticoagulant therapy in older patients?
This review outlines the complex risk-benefit considerations for prescribing VKAs and DOACs in older adults prone to thromboembolism and bleeding.
Demands cautious individualized decisions in very elderly patients; leaves open optimal VKA versus DOAC selection for prospective trials.
Arterial and venous thromboembolism are both more common in older adults. The use of anticoagulants, the mainstay to prevent thromboembolism, requires consideration of the balance between risk and benefit. Such consideration is even more important in the very elderly in whom the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding and thrombosis are higher. This review will focus on the challenges of implementing and managing anticoagulant therapy in older patients in an era when the options for anticoagulants include not only vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), but also direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gross et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: