Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is common in elderly cancer patients, but standard anticoagulants have disadvantages, requiring consideration of DOAC efficacy, safety, and specific elderly clinical factors like organ impairment and polypharmacy.
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve efficacy and safety in elderly patients with cancer?
Do direct oral anticoagulants improve efficacy and safety in elderly patients with cancer?
Direct oral anticoagulants offer an effective and convenient alternative for thromboprophylaxis in elderly cancer patients, provided that renal/hepatic function and drug interactions are carefully managed.
May support DOAC thromboprophylaxis in elderly cancer patients; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs.
Venous thromboembolism is a common complication in elderly patients, especially in the presence of cancer. Currently used for thromboprophylaxis, vitamin K antagonists and low molecular weight heparins are effective, but have a number of disadvantages, which leads to a rare prescription of anticoagulant therapy in elderly patients. Modern studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can also be effective and safe in this category of patients, and the convenience of their use increases patient adherence to treatment. However, elderly patients have a number of features that must be considered when prescribing anticoagulant therapy. So, in the presence of renal failure or impaired liver function, it is necessary to consider the possibility of adjusting the prescribed dose. And in connection with the polypharmacy common in old age and the drug interactions associated with it, it is necessary to carefully consider all the drugs taken by the patient for their compatibility and, if necessary, make replacements. This review presents data on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly patients, as well as presents and systematizes various clinical situations when therapy correction or careful monitoring is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Грибкова et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: