Key result
Upfront two-stenting for ACS bifurcation lesions yields ~17% major cardiovascular events rate, predicted by clopidogrel and SES.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the upfront two-stent strategy for true coronary bifurcation lesions with a large side branch in acute coronary syndrome.
Is an upfront two-stent strategy safe and feasible for true coronary bifurcation lesions with a large side branch in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Cohort (n=201)
Is an upfront two-stent strategy safe and feasible for true coronary bifurcation lesions with a large side branch in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
An upfront two-stent strategy is feasible and safe for true coronary bifurcation lesions with a large side branch in ACS patients, though clopidogrel and sirolimus-eluting stent use may predict higher MACE risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support upfront two-stenting in ACS bifurcation lesions with large side branches; leaves open optimal stent and P2Y12 selection pending randomized trials.
Background and Objectives: Little is known about the upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to present our two-year follow-up results on the U2SS by using different two-stent techniques for the true CBL with a large side branch (SB) in ACS patients, including unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to identify independent predictors of the presence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after intervention. Materials and Methods: The study included 201 consecutive ACS patients with true CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using U2SS from October 2015 to March 2018. Clinical outcomes at follow-up were assessed. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: 31.3% of the patients had an UA, 46.3% had an NSTEMI, and 22.4% had an STEMI. CBL was most frequently located in the left anterior descending (LAD)/diagonal artery (59.2%). In total, 71.1% of the patients had a Medina classification (1,1,1). Overall, 62.2% of cases were treated with mini-crush stenting. Clopidogrel was given in 23.9% of the patients; 71.1% of the patients received everolimus eluting stent (EES); and 11.9% received a sirolimus eluting stent (SES). Final kissing balloon inflation was carried out in all patients, with an unsatisfactory rate of 5%. A proximal optimization technique sequence was successfully carried out in all patients. The MACE incidence was 16.9% with a median follow-up period of 2.1 years. There were seven cardiac deaths (3.5%). The TLR rate was 13.4% (n = 27), with PCI treatment in 16 patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting treatment in 11 patients. After multivariate penalized logistic regression analysis (Firth logistic regression), clopidogrel use (odds ratio (OR): 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41–2.51; p = 0.007) and SES use (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 0.31–2.64; p = 0.014) were independent predictors of the presence of MACE. Conclusion: U2SS is feasible and safe for the true CBLs with large and diseased SB in ACS patients, and is related to a relatively low incidence of MACE. Clopidogrel use and SES use may predict the MACE development in ACS patients treated using U2SS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yurtdaş et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome with true coronary bifurcation lesions (n=201). Upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. An upfront two-stent strategy for true coronary bifurcation lesions in ACS patients resulted in a 16.9% major cardiovascular events rate at 2.1 years, with clopidogrel and SES use independently predicting major cardiovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: