Key result
Major cardiovascular diseases are bidirectionally linked, peaking at ~25-fold higher risk between HF and AF.
Why the study?
While certain CVDs are known to be associated, the links and temporal trends between other CVDs are less studied.
What are the temporal epidemiological and genetic associations between major cardiovascular diseases over a 40-year follow-up?
Cohort (n=2,322)
What are the temporal epidemiological and genetic associations between major cardiovascular diseases over a 40-year follow-up?
Effect estimate: RR 24-26
Over 40 years, major cardiovascular diseases are strongly pairwise associated regardless of temporal order, with the strongest bidirectional link between heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: It is known that certain cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are associated, like atrial fibrillation and stroke. However, for other CVDs, the links and temporal trends are less studied. In this longitudinal study, we have investigated temporal epidemiological and genetic associations between different CVDs. METHODS: The ULSAM (Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men; 2322 men aged 50 years) has been followed for 40 years regarding 4 major CVDs (incident myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation). For the genetic analyses, publicly available data were used. RESULTS: Using multistate modeling, significant relationships were seen between pairs of all of the 4 investigated CVDs. However, the risk of obtaining one additional CVD differed substantially both between different CVDs and between their temporal order. The relationship between heart failure and atrial fibrillation showed a high risk ratio (risk ratios, 24-26) regardless of the temporal order. A consistent association was seen also for myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation but with a lower relative risk (risk ratios, 4-5). In contrast, the risk of receiving a diagnosis of heart failure following a myocardial infarction was almost twice as high as for the reverse temporal order (risk ratios, 16 versus 9). Genetic loci linked to traditional risk factors could partly explain the observed associations between the CVDs, but pathway analyses disclosed also other pathophysiological links. CONCLUSIONS: During 40 years, all of the 4 investigated CVDs were pairwise associated with each other regardless of the temporal order of occurrence, but the risk magnitude differed between different CVDs and their temporal order. Genetic analyses disclosed new pathophysiological links between CVDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lind et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Major Cardiovascular Diseases (n=2,322). Incident cardiovascular disease vs. Reverse temporal order was evaluated on Risk of obtaining one additional cardiovascular disease (RR 24-26). Over 40 years, major cardiovascular diseases were pairwise associated regardless of temporal order, with the highest risk ratio (24-26) observed between heart failure and atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: