Key result
Quality measurement in heart failure has evolved to address the underutilization of effective therapies and improve patient outcomes, though significant implementation challenges remain.
This review highlights the importance and evolution of quality measurement to improve the utilization of effective therapies and outcomes in heart failure.
Encourages attention to evolving HF quality metrics; leaves open optimal implementation strategies for future research.
Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, representing a leading cause of death and hospitalization among U.S. Medicare beneficiaries. Advances in science have generated effective interventions to reduce adverse outcomes in HF, particularly in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Unfortunately, effective therapies for heart failure are often not utilized in an effective, safe, timely, equitable, patient-centered, and efficient manner. Further, the risk of adverse outcomes for HF remains high. The last decades have witnessed the growth of efforts to measure and improve the care and outcomes of patients with HF. This paper will review the evolution of quality measurement for HF, including a brief history of quality measurement in medicine; the measures that have been employed to characterize quality in heart failure; how the measures are obtained; how measures are employed; and present and future challenges surrounding quality measurement in heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fitzgerald et al. (2012) conducted a review in Heart failure. Quality measurement was evaluated. Quality measurement in heart failure has evolved to address the underutilization of effective therapies and improve patient outcomes, though significant implementation challenges remain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: