Why the study?
Does intermittent rhythm monitoring accurately estimate true atrial fibrillation burden compared to continuous monitoring in patients with AF?
Population
647 patients with implantable continuous monitoring (CM) devices
Comparison
Simulated intermittent rhythm monitoring of… vs True atrial fibrillation burden measured by…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
687 patient-years total
Authors
Loading...
Intermittent monitoring may substantially misestimate true AF burden; leaves open whether continuous assessment is required for accurate outcome evaluation.
Does intermittent rhythm monitoring accurately estimate true atrial fibrillation burden compared to continuous monitoring in patients with AF?
Intermittent rhythm monitoring provides unreliable estimates of true atrial fibrillation burden, particularly in paroxysmal AF, and should not be used to evaluate outcomes after AF interventions.
Charitos et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: