The HAVOC score, based on 7 clinical variables, successfully stratified patients for atrial fibrillation risk after cryptogenic stroke or TIA with good model discrimination (AUC = 0.77).
Cohort (n=9,589)
Estimación del efecto: AUC 0.77
OBJECTIVES: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in post-cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients carries important therapeutic implications. METHODS: To risk stratify CS/TIA patients for later development of AF, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 1995 to 2015 in the Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment (STRIDE). RESULTS: Of the 9,589 adult patients (age ≥40 years) with CS/TIA included, 482 (5%) patients developed AF post CS/TIA. Of those patients, 28.4, 26.3, and 45.3% were diagnosed with AF 1-12 months, 1-3 years, and >3 years after the index CS/TIA, respectively. Age (≥75 years), obesity, congestive heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and valve disease are significant risk factors, with the following respective odds ratios (95% CI): 1.73 (1.39-2.16), 1.53 (1.05-2.18), 3.34 (2.61-4.28), 2.01 (1.53-2.68), 1.72 (1.35-2.19), 1.37 (1.02-1.84), and 2.05 (1.55-2.69). A risk-scoring system, i.e., the HAVOC score, was constructed using these 7 clinical variables that successfully stratify patients into 3 risk groups, with good model discrimination (area under the curve = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study support the strategy of looking longer and harder for AF in post-CS/TIA patients. The HAVOC score identifies different levels of AF risk and may be used to select patients for extended rhythm monitoring.
Kwong et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=9,589). HAVOC score was evaluated on Development of atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.77). The HAVOC score, based on 7 clinical variables, successfully stratified patients for atrial fibrillation risk after cryptogenic stroke or TIA with good model discrimination (AUC = 0.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: