Key result
DAPT with clopidogrel shows no benefit over aspirin monotherapy for stroke, MI, or death.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin monotherapy in patients with acute, nonminor, and noncardioembolic stroke.
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin reduce the composite risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in patients with acute, nonminor, noncardioembolic stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy?
Cohort (n=4,461)
Yes
Does dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin reduce the composite risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in patients with acute, nonminor, noncardioembolic stroke compared to aspirin monotherapy?
Effect estimate: HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.79-1.04)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.9% vs 22.6%
p-value: p=0.13
In patients with acute, nonminor, noncardioembolic stroke, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin did not significantly reduce the 3-month composite risk of stroke, MI, or death compared to aspirin monotherapy.
DAPT should not yet replace aspirin; leaves open confirmation of no benefit in randomized trials.
Background and Purpose— This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin (DAPT) with that of aspirin monotherapy (AM) in patients with acute, nonminor, and noncardioembolic stroke. Methods— Using a prospective, nationwide, multicenter stroke registry database, acute (within 24 hours of onset), nonminor (baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 4–15), and noncardioembolic stroke patients were identified. Propensity scores using inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to adjust baseline imbalances between the DAPT and AM groups. A primary outcome measure was a composite of all types of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 3 months of stroke onset. Results— Among the 4461 patients meeting the eligibility criteria (age, 69±13 years; men, 57.7%), 52.5% (n=2340) received AM, and 47.5% (n=2121) received DAPT. The primary outcome event was not significantly different between the DAPT group and the AM group (20.9% versus 22.6%, P =0.13). The event rates of all types of stroke were also not different between the 2 groups (19.3% versus 20.1%, P =0.35), while all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DAPT group than in the AM group (3.4% versus 4.9%, P =0.02). In the propensity-weighted Cox proportional hazards models with robust estimation, DAPT did not reduce the risk of the primary outcome event (hazards ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79–1.04) but did reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (0.69; 0.49–0.97). There was no treatment heterogeneity among the predefined subgroups, although the potential benefits of DAPT were suggested in subpopulations of moderate-to-severe relevant arterial stenosis and relatively severe deficits (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12–15). Conclusions— Compared to AM, clopidogrel plus aspirin did not reduce the risk of the primary outcome event during the first 3 months after a nonminor, noncardioembolic, ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute, nonminor, and noncardioembolic stroke (n=4,461). Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel plus aspirin) vs. Aspirin monotherapy was evaluated on Composite of all types of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 3 months (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.04, p=0.13). Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of stroke, MI, or death at 3 months compared to aspirin monotherapy (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.04; P=0.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: