Key result
LV proteomic analysis identifies distinct myocardial protein signatures linked to aortic regurgitation and stenosis.
Why the study?
LV reverse remodeling after AV surgery is less predictable in chronic AR than in AS, prompting investigation into specific LV myocardial protein signatures that may contribute to differential disease progression.
What are the specific LV myocardial protein signatures differentiating chronic aortic regurgitation from aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=38)
What are the specific LV myocardial protein signatures differentiating chronic aortic regurgitation from aortic stenosis?
Proteomic analysis reveals distinct LV myocardial protein signatures in aortic regurgitation versus aortic stenosis, highlighting different pathophysiological remodeling pathways.
Distinct LV proteomic signatures in AR versus AS may reflect differential remodeling; hypothesis-generating for targeted therapies pending prospective validation.
Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after aortic valve (AV) surgery is less predictable in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) than in aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to disclose specific LV myocardial protein signatures possibly contributing to differential disease progression. Global protein profiling of LV myocardial samples excised from the subaortic interventricular septum in patients with isolated AR or AS undergoing AV surgery was performed using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry. Based on label-free quantitation protein intensities, a logistic regression model was calculated and adjusted for age, sex and protein concentration. Web-based functional enrichment analyses of phenotype-associated proteins were performed utilizing g:Profiler and STRING. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD039662. Lysates from 38 patients, including 25 AR and 13 AS samples, were analyzed. AR patients presented with significantly larger LV diameters and volumes (end-diastolic diameter: 61 (12) vs. 48 (13) mm, p < 0.001; end-diastolic volume: 180.0 (74.6) vs. 92.3 (78.4), p = 0.001). A total of 171 proteins were associated with patient phenotype: 117 were positively associated with AR and the enrichment of intracellular compartment proteins (i.e., assigned to carbohydrate and nucleotide metabolism, protein biosynthesis and the proteasome) was detected. Additionally, 54 were positively associated with AS and the enrichment of extracellular compartment proteins (i.e., assigned to the immune and hematopoietic system) was observed. In summary, functional enrichment analysis revealed specific AR- and AS-associated signatures of LV myocardial proteins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holst et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Aortic Regurgitation and Aortic Stenosis (n=38). Aortic Regurgitation vs. Aortic Stenosis was evaluated on Left ventricular myocardial proteins associated with patient phenotype. Proteomic analysis of left ventricular myocardial samples identified 117 proteins positively associated with aortic regurgitation and 54 proteins positively associated with aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: