Key result
Ablation line distance during AI-guided PVI does not affect first-pass isolation or atrial arrhythmia freedom.
Why the study?
How wide the encircling line is made may influence PVI outcomes, and the distance between encircling lines may correspond to the extent of WACA.
Does the distance between encircling ablation lines influence first-pass isolation rate and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients undergoing PVI?
Observational (n=116)
Does the distance between encircling ablation lines influence first-pass isolation rate and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients undergoing PVI?
The distance between ablation lines during AI-guided PVI does not significantly impact first-pass isolation rates or long-term arrhythmia recurrence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Line distance showed no impact on PVI outcomes in this cohort; leaves open optimal ablation strategies for AI-guided isolation.
INTRODUCTION: How wide the encircling line is made may influence the outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In the present study we hypothesised that the distance between the lines encircling the pulmonary veins may correspond with the extent of wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA). The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the distance and the area between the lines on the posterior wall of the left atrium on first-pass isolation rate and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients undergoing PVI ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients underwent circumferential ablation index (AI)-guided PVI. The distance between the encircling ablation lines was measured off-line between the uppermost points (right and left) and the lowest points and as the area between the encircling lines on the posterior wall. The first-pass isolation rate and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia were 59% and 73%, respectively. Distance between the encircling lines measured linearly or as the area of the posterior wall, assessed as direct values or indexed to left atrial dimensions, did not differ between patients with and without first-pass isolation or between patients with and without recurrences of atrial arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The distance between the ablation lines did not influence the rate of first-pass isolation and arrhythmia recurrence in the long-term follow-up after PVI procedures incorporating the ablation index protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krzyżanowski et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=116). Distance between encircling ablation lines was evaluated on First-pass isolation rate and 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia. The distance between ablation lines during AI-guided pulmonary vein isolation did not influence the rate of first-pass isolation (overall 59%) or 12-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia (overall 73%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: