Key result
Novel nomogram using female sex, TIA, TTR, and anemia predicts warfarin-related bleeding with 0.68 AUC.
Why the study?
Bleeding is the main reason patients discontinue warfarin, but no nomogram model currently exists to predict warfarin-associated bleeding risk.
Does a novel nomogram model accurately predict warfarin-related major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in heart disease outpatients?
Cohort (n=280)
Does a novel nomogram model accurately predict warfarin-related major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in heart disease outpatients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.78)
A novel nomogram incorporating female sex, TIA, TTR, and anemia offers acceptable discrimination for predicting warfarin-related bleeding, outperforming existing scoring systems.
May support individualized warfarin bleeding risk assessment; leaves open external validation before clinical adoption.
Warfarin is a widely used anticoagulant, and bleeding complications are the main reason why patients discontinue the drug. Currently, there is no nomogram model for warfarin-associated bleeding risk. The aim of this study was to develop a risk-prediction nomogram model for warfarin-related major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. A total of 280 heart disease outpatients taking warfarin were enrolled, 42 of whom experienced major or CRNM bleeding at the one-year follow-up. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression model was employed to identify potential predictors. Backward stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion was used to establish the optimal predictive nomogram model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The nomogram consisted of four predictors: female (OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 0.91-3.94), TIA (OR = 6.47; 95% CI: 1.85-22.7), TTR (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-1.00), and anemia (OR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.06-4.84). The model had acceptable discrimination (area under the ROC curve = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78), and was significantly better than the existing nine warfarin-related bleeding prediction scoring systems. The calibration plot and Hosmer–Lemeshow test (χ² = 7.557; P = .478) indicated well-calibrated data in the model. The DCA demonstrated good clinical utility. In this study, we developed a nomogram to predict the risk of warfarin-related major or CRNM bleeding. The model has good performance, allows rapid risk stratification of warfarin users, and provides a basis for personalized treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Heart disease outpatients taking warfarin (n=280). Warfarin-related bleeding prediction nomogram vs. Nine existing scoring systems was evaluated on Warfarin-related major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78). A novel nomogram incorporating female sex, TIA, TTR, and anemia predicted warfarin-related major or CRNM bleeding with an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: