Key result
ATRIA risk score effectively predicts major bleeding in AF patients on warfarin with ~0.74 c-index.
Why the study?
Optimal decision making regarding warfarin use for atrial fibrillation requires estimation of hemorrhage risk.
Cohort (n=9,186)
The simple 5-variable ATRIA score effectively quantifies major bleeding risk for atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin, improving risk stratification over prior schemes to aid clinical decision-making.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The majority of patients with atrial fibrillation – at least 70 percent -- would probably benefit from warfarin or other anticoagulation therapies. Based on our risk-stratification scoring, about 10 percent of patients who take warfarin are in the high bleeding-risk category. However, the majority of patients fall into the low bleeding-risk group.”
“The ATRIA bleeding risk tool gives doctors a way to estimate a person's yearly bleeding risk when taking warfarin, which then can be compared to the risk of stroke without warfarin therapy. Doctors and patients then can decide together on the”
ATRIA score may aid hemorrhage stratification in warfarin-treated AF; leaves open prospective validation against other scores before routine adoption.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop a risk stratification score to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage. BACKGROUND: Optimal decision making regarding warfarin use for atrial fibrillation requires estimation of hemorrhage risk. METHODS: We followed up 9,186 patients with atrial fibrillation contributing 32,888 person-years of follow-up on warfarin, obtaining data from clinical databases and validating hemorrhage events using medical record review. We used Cox regression models to develop a hemorrhage risk stratification score, selecting candidate variables using bootstrapping approaches. The final model was internally validated by split-sample testing and compared with 6 published hemorrhage risk schemes. RESULTS: We observed 461 first major hemorrhages during follow-up (1.4% annually). Five independent variables were included in the final model and weighted by regression coefficients: anemia (3 points), severe renal disease (e.g., glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min or dialysis-dependent, 3 points), age ≥75 years (2 points), prior bleeding (1 point), and hypertension (1 point). Major hemorrhage rates ranged from 0.4% (0 points) to 17.3% per year (10 points). Collapsed into a 3-category risk score, major hemorrhage rates were 0.8% for low risk (0 to 3 points), 2.6% for intermediate risk (4 points), and 5.8% for high risk (5 to 10 points). The c-index for the continuous risk score was 0.74 and 0.69 for the 3-category score, higher than in the other risk schemes. There was net reclassification improvement versus all 6 comparators (from 27% to 56%). CONCLUSIONS: A simple 5-variable risk score was effective in quantifying the risk of warfarin-associated hemorrhage in a large community-based cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=9,186). Warfarin was evaluated on First major hemorrhage (c-index 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.78). The 5-variable ATRIA risk score effectively predicted major hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin, demonstrating good discrimination with a continuous c-index of 0.74.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: