Key result
Transseptal puncture with a coronary guidewire achieves ~81% first-pass left atrial access versus conventional contrast.
Why the study?
Transseptal puncture for left heart intervention can sometimes be complex and life-threatening, prompting the need for a safe and effective facilitation method.
Does using a coronary guidewire instead of an inner stylet improve the first-pass success rate of transseptal puncture in patients requiring left heart intervention?
RCT (n=200)
Does using a coronary guidewire instead of an inner stylet improve the first-pass success rate of transseptal puncture in patients requiring left heart intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 81.1% vs 75%
p-value: p=< .001
Using a 0.014-inch coronary guidewire to facilitate transseptal puncture is safe and significantly improves the first-pass success rate compared to the conventional contrast-guided technique.
Supports coronary guidewire for higher first-pass left atrial access; confirms RCT superiority over contrast-guided puncture.
INTRODUCTION: Transseptal puncture (TSP) is routinely performed for left heart intervention, but it can sometimes be complex and life-threatening. This study introduced a safe and effective method to facilitate TSP for left atrial access. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 200 patients (190 with atrial fibrillation, 10 with a left accessory pathway) were prospectively analyzed. In the guidewire group, TSP was performed using a SWARTZ sheath and a Brockenbrough needle with a 0.014-inch coronary guidewire instead of an inner stylet. The needle tip position was confirmed by pushing the guidewire into the left superior pulmonary vein after initial puncture in 100 patients. In the contrast group, TSP was performed in 100 patients using standard devices by injecting contrast to confirm needle-tip position. Left atrial access was achieved successfully in all patients in the two groups without serious complications. The guidewire group showed a higher first-pass rate for left atrial access compared with the contrast group (81.1% vs. 75% p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Coronary guidewire TSP is safe and is associated with a high success rate, and it is thus a useful alternative to conventional TSP. This method is useful for patients with septal aneurysms and contrast allergies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation or left accessory pathway requiring transseptal puncture (n=200). Transseptal puncture using a 0.014-inch coronary guidewire vs. Conventional transseptal puncture using contrast injection was evaluated on First-pass rate for left atrial access (p=< .001). Transseptal puncture using a coronary guidewire achieved a higher first-pass rate for left atrial access compared to conventional contrast-guided puncture (81.1% vs. 75%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: