Key result
Angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture improved the one-time success rate compared to the conventional approach (92.4% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.001) during left atrial appendage occlusion.
Why the study?
The study was performed to compare the usability, efficiency, and safety of a modified angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture technique versus the conventional approach during LAAO procedures for atrial fibrillation.
Does angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture improve the one-time success rate of TSP in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAO?
RCT (n=263)
randomly assigned
Yes
Does angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture improve the one-time success rate of TSP in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing LAAO?
Absolute Event Rate: 92.4% vs 77.3%
p-value: p=0.001
Angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture significantly improves the one-time success rate and shortens procedure time compared to conventional puncture during LAAO procedures.
Supports guidewire-assisted TSP to raise first-pass success in LAAO; extends RCT evidence for assisted transseptal techniques.
AIMS: This study was performed to compare the usability, efficiency, and safety of a modified angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture (TSP) technique vs. the conventional approach in facilitating access into the left atrium during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ADVANCE-LAAO trial (Angioplasty Guidewire-Assisted vs. Conventional Transseptal Puncture for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion) was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (NCT05125159). Patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAO were prospectively enrolled from four centres and randomly assigned to an angioplasty guidewire-assisted TSP group (n = 131) or to a conventional Brockenbrough needle TSP group (n = 132). The primary endpoint was the one-time success rate of TSP. We also analysed the TSP procedure time, failure rate of the assigned TSP type, radiation dose, contrast dose, and procedural complications in both groups. All patients in the guidewire-assisted group underwent successful TSP, whereas five in the standard conventional group switched to the guidewire-assisted approach. The guidewire-assisted puncture improved the one-time success rate (92.4 vs. 77.3%, P = 0.001), shortened the TSP procedure time (109.2 ± 48.2 vs. 120.5 ± 57.6 s, P = 0.023), and tended to have a higher rate of good coaxial orientation of the sheath with the left atrial appendage during the LAAO procedure (66.4 vs. 54.5%, P = 0.059). No TSP-related complications occurred in the guidewire-assisted TSP group, whereas two complications occurred in the conventional TSP group. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of the assigned TSP type, the total procedure time, the total radiation dose, the rate of successful LAAO implantation, or the procedural complication rate between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that angioplasty guidewire-assisted puncture can effectively improve the success rate of TSP during LAAO procedures. This novel technique has high potential for application in interventional therapies requiring TSP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=263). Angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture vs. Conventional Brockenbrough needle transseptal puncture was evaluated on One-time success rate of transseptal puncture (p=0.001). Angioplasty guidewire-assisted transseptal puncture improved the one-time success rate compared to the conventional approach (92.4% vs. 77.3%, P = 0.001) during left atrial appendage occlusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: