Key result
Olmesartan combination therapy shows similar major cardiovascular event rates to active comparators in advanced hypertension.
Why the study?
Olmesartan has been linked to numerical imbalances in cardiovascular mortality versus placebo, and contemporary real-world evidence across different populations is limited.
Does olmesartan in combination therapy improve or worsen cardiovascular outcomes compared to other antihypertensives in patients with advanced hypertension?
Cohort (n=24,806)
Yes
Does olmesartan in combination therapy improve or worsen cardiovascular outcomes compared to other antihypertensives in patients with advanced hypertension?
p-value: p=0.91
In real-world practice, olmesartan used in combination therapy for advanced hypertension demonstrates similar cardiovascular safety and effectiveness compared to other antihypertensives, challenging prior concerns of increased cardiovascular mortality.
Olmesartan combinations yield similar cardiovascular outcomes in advanced hypertension; supports real-world safety equivalence but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Compared with placebo, olmesartan has been linked to numerical imbalances in cardiovascular mortality. There is a paucity of contemporary real-world evidence on this agent for different study populations. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of olmesartan and other antihypertensives in patients with advanced hypertension. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study used data from the Korea University Medical Center database, built from electronic health records. Patients prescribed at least two antihypertensive medications as a combined therapy were followed-up for 3 years. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure. Adjusted outcomes were compared using propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: Among 24 806 patients, 4050 (16.3%) were olmesartan users between January 2017 and December 2018. The average patient age was 64 years, 45% were women, and 41% had diabetes. Olmesartan users were younger and less likely to have diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. In PS-matched cohort, the 3-year cumulative incidences of the primary outcome were similar between the two groups ( P = 0.91). The cumulative incidence of MI at 3 years was 1.4% in olmesartan users (4.8 per 1000 person-years) and 1.5% in active comparators (5.2 per 1000 person-years; P = 0.74). Olmesartan also showed similar safety profiles, including acute kidney injury and newly started dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, olmesartan use in combination therapy resulted in similar cardiovascular outcomes when compared with those of active comparators, and our findings did not show any conclusive evidence that olmesartan is harmful in patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in advanced hypertension (n=24,806). olmesartan vs. active comparators was evaluated on composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (p=0.91). Olmesartan in combination therapy for advanced hypertension resulted in similar 3-year cumulative incidences of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome compared with active comparators (P=0.91).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: