Why the study?
Does olmesartan improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy?
Does olmesartan improve renal and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy?
Olmesartan did not improve the primary composite renal outcome when added to standard antihypertensive therapy including ACE inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy, and was associated with increased hyperkalemia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support adding olmesartan to ACE inhibitors in type 2 diabetic nephropathy; reinforces caution on dual renin-angiotensin blockade.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The renal and cardiovascular protective effects of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) remain controversial in type 2 diabetic patients treated with a contemporary regimen including an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). METHODS: We examined the effects of olmesartan, an ARB, on primary composite outcome of doubling of serum creatinine, endstage renal disease and death in type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy. Secondary outcome included composite cardiovascular outcomes, changes in renal function and proteinuria. Randomisation and allocation to trial group were carried out by a central computer system. Participants, caregivers, the people carrying out examinations and people assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-seven (377 Japanese, 200 Chinese) patients treated with antihypertensive therapy (73.5% [n = 424] received concomitant ACEI), were given either once-daily olmesartan (10-40 mg) (n = 288) or placebo (n = 289) over 3.2 ± 0.6 years (mean±SD). In the olmesartan group, 116 developed the primary outcome (41.1%) compared with 129 (45.4%) in the placebo group (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.75, 1.24; p = 0.791). Olmesartan significantly decreased blood pressure, proteinuria and rate of change of reciprocal serum creatinine. Cardiovascular death was higher in the olmesartan group than the placebo group (ten vs three cases), whereas major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death plus non-fatal stroke and myocardial infarction) and all-cause death were similar between the two groups (major adverse cardiovascular events 18 vs 21 cases, all-cause deaths; 19 vs 20 cases). Hyperkalaemia was more frequent in the olmesartan group than the placebo group (9.2% vs 5.3%). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Olmesartan was well tolerated but did not improve renal outcome on top of ACEI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00141453.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: