Key result
SBP control at <50% of visits is linked to ~39% higher CVD risk versus sustained control.
Why the study?
Achieving blood pressure control lowers cardiovascular disease risk, but less is known about the risk associated with sustained blood pressure control over time.
Does sustained blood pressure control (SBP < 140 mm Hg at 100% of visits) reduce cardiovascular events and mortality compared to inconsistent control in adults taking antihypertensive medication?
Observational (n=24,309)
Does sustained blood pressure control (SBP < 140 mm Hg at 100% of visits) reduce cardiovascular events and mortality compared to inconsistent control in adults taking antihypertensive medication?
Sustained systolic blood pressure control (<140 mm Hg) across all visits is associated with significantly lower risks of stroke, heart failure, and composite cardiovascular outcomes compared to inconsistent control.
May support emphasizing consistent BP control in practice; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
Achieving blood pressure (BP) control is associated with lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, but less is known about CVD risk associated with sustained BP control over time. This observational analysis of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was restricted to participants with four to seven visits with systolic BP (SBP) measurements during a 22-month period (n = 24 309). The authors categorized participants as having sustained BP control (SBP < 140 mm Hg) at 100%, 75% to <100%, 50% to <75%, and <50% of visits during this period. Outcomes included fatal coronary heart disease (CHD)/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), a composite CVD outcome (fatal CHD/nonfatal MI, stroke, or HF), and mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of category of sustained BP control for each outcome were obtained using proportional hazards models. SBP control was present among 20.0% of participants at 100%, 16.4% at 75% to less than 100%, 27.0% at 50% to less than 75%, and 36.6% at less than 50% of visits. Compared to those with SBP control at 100% visits, adjusted HR (95% CI) among those with SBP control at <50% of visits was 1.16 (0.93-1.44) for fatal CHD/nonfatal MI, 1.71 (1.26-2.32) for stroke, 1.63 (1.30-2.06) for HF, 1.39 (1.20-1.62) for the composite CVD outcome, and 1.14 (0.99-1.30) for mortality. Sustained SBP control may be beneficial for preventing stroke, HF, and CVD outcomes in adults taking antihypertensive medication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowling et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=24,309). Sustained SBP control at <50% of visits vs. Sustained SBP control at 100% of visits was evaluated on Composite CVD outcome (fatal CHD/nonfatal MI, stroke, or HF) (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.62). Compared to sustained systolic blood pressure control at 100% of visits, control at <50% of visits was associated with a higher risk of composite CVD outcomes (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.20-1.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: