Key result
Adjunct dapagliflozin proves cost-effective for HFpEF or HFmrEF in China at ~$11,865/QALY.
Why the study?
The cost-utility of adjunct dapagliflozin to standard therapy among patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF remained unclear.
Does the adjunct use of dapagliflozin to standard therapy improve cost-effectiveness in 65-year-old patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF?
Does the adjunct use of dapagliflozin to standard therapy improve cost-effectiveness in 65-year-old patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF?
Effect estimate: ICER $11 865.33/QALY
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 5.84%
Dapagliflozin added to standard therapy is cost-effective for patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF from the perspective of the Chinese public healthcare system.
May support payer decisions for dapagliflozin in Chinese HFpEF/HFmrEF; leaves open generalizability and real-world confirmation.
AIMS: The DELIVER study demonstrates a significant improvement in cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure among heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Cost-utility of the adjunct use of dapagliflozin to standard therapy among patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: A five-state Markov mode was constructed to project health and clinical outcomes of the adjunct use of dapagliflozin to standard therapy among 65-year-old patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. A cost-utility analysis was performed based on the DELIVER study and national statistical database. The cost and utility was inflated to 2022 by the usual discount rate of 5%. The primary outcomes were total cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patients as well as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Sensitivity analyses were also applied. Over a 15 year lifetime horizon, the average cost per patient was $7245.77 and $5407.55 in the dapagliflozin group and the standard group, along with an incremental cost of $1838.22. The average QALYs per patient was 6.00 QALYs and 5.84 QALYs in the dapagliflozin group and the standard group, along with an incremental QALYs of 0.15 QALYs, resulting in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $11 865.33/QALY, which was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $12 652.5/QALY. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the cardiovascular death in both group was the most sensitive variable. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that when the WTP thresholds were $12 652.5/QALY and $37 957.5/QALY, the probabilities of being cost-effective with dapagliflozin as an add-on were 54.6% and 71.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From a public healthcare system perspective, the adjunct use of dapagliflozin to standard therapy among patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF generated advantages in cost-effectiveness in China at a WTP of $12 652.5/QALY, which promoted the rational use of dapagliflozin for heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2023) studied Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF). Dapagliflozin vs. Standard therapy was evaluated on Total cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER $11 865.33/QALY). Adjunct dapagliflozin to standard therapy in HFpEF or HFmrEF was cost-effective in China, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $11,865.33/QALY over a 15-year horizon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: