Key result
Dapagliflozin reduces HF hospitalizations regardless of recent hospitalization, with similar acute eGFR declines.
Why the study?
Patients recently hospitalized for heart failure often have unstable haemodynamics, worsening renal failure, and elevated risk for recurrent events, creating a need to evaluate renal and blood pressure effects of dapagliflozin in this setting.
Does dapagliflozin safely improve clinical outcomes without adversely affecting eGFR or blood pressure in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
RCT
Randomized
Does dapagliflozin safely improve clinical outcomes without adversely affecting eGFR or blood pressure in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Absolute Event Rate: -2% vs -3.4%
p-value: p=0.12
Initiation of dapagliflozin in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction is safe, with minimal effects on blood pressure and no increase in renal or hypovolemic adverse events.
Supports early post-discharge initiation of dapagliflozin in HFmrEF/HFpEF; extends efficacy and renal safety data to the high-risk transition period.
Aims Patients recently hospitalized for heart failure (HF) often have unstable haemodynamics and experience worsening renal failure, and are at elevated risk for recurrent HF events. In DELIVER, dapagliflozin reduced HF events or cardiovascular death including among patients who were hospitalized or recently hospitalized. Methods and results We examined the effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope (acute and chronic), 1-month change in systolic blood pressure, and the occurrence of serious hypovolaemic or renal adverse events in patients with and without HF hospitalization within 30 days of randomization. The 654 (90 randomized during hospitalization, 147 1–7 days post-discharge and 417 8–30 days post-discharge) recently hospitalized patients had lower baseline eGFR compared with those without recent HF hospitalization (median [interquartile range] 55 [43, 71] vs. 60 [47, 75] ml/min/1.73 m2). Dapagliflozin consistently reduced the risk of all-cause (pinteraction = 0.20), cardiac-related (pinteraction = 0.75), and HF-specific (pinteraction = 0.90) hospitalizations, irrespective of recent HF hospitalization. In those recently hospitalized, acute placebo-corrected eGFR reductions with dapagliflozin were modest and similar to patients without recent hospitalization (−2.0 [−4.1, +0.1] vs. −3.4 [−3.9, −2.9] ml/min/1.73 m2, pinteraction = 0.12). Dapagliflozin's effect to slow chronic eGFR decline was similar regardless of recent hospitalization (pinteraction = 0.57). Dapagliflozin had a minimal effect on 1-month systolic blood pressure and to a similar degree in patients with and without recent hospitalization (−1.3 vs.−1.8 mmHg, pinteraction = 0.64). There was no treatment-related excess in renal or hypovolaemic serious adverse events, irrespective of recent HF hospitalization. Conclusion In patients recently hospitalized with HF, initiation of dapagliflozin had minimal effects on blood pressure and did not increase renal or hypovolaemic serious adverse events, yet afforded long-term cardiovascular and kidney protective effects. These data suggest that the benefit to risk ratio favours initiation of dapagliflozin among stabilized patients hospitalized or recently hospitalized for HF. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03619213.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatur et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Acute placebo-corrected eGFR reduction (ml/min/1.73 m2) in patients with vs without recent HF hospitalization (p=0.12). Dapagliflozin reduced HF hospitalizations irrespective of recent hospitalization (p-interaction=0.90), with similar acute placebo-corrected eGFR reductions (-2.0 vs -3.4 ml/min/1.73 m2; p-int=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: