Key result
Drug-coated plus cutting balloons enter RCT against cutting balloon alone for coronary bifurcation side branches.
Why the study?
Side branch restenosis remains a dilemma in coronary bifurcation lesions, and the efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloon combined with cutting balloon angioplasty versus cutting balloon angioplasty alone have not been evaluated in randomized trials.
Does a drug-coated balloon combined with a cutting balloon reduce late lumen loss in the side branch of patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions?
RCT (n=140)
Single-blind
1:1
Yes
Does a drug-coated balloon combined with a cutting balloon reduce late lumen loss in the side branch of patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to determine if combining a drug-coated balloon with a cutting balloon improves angiographic and clinical outcomes for side branch interventions in true coronary bifurcation lesions.
Background Coronary bifurcation lesions are common of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and the optimal interventional therapy strategy is still a matter of debate and remains a challenge for interventional cardiologists. The provisional stenting technique is still a preferred method for most bifurcation lesions, but restenosis of the side branch (SB) occurs in approximately 17–19% of cases. Therefore, the dilemma of reducing SB restenosis still exists, and further research on strategies to reduce restenosis for SB is necessary. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) can reduce clinical events in small vessel disease and in-stent restenosis. The efficacy and safety of DCB for SB of true coronary bifurcation lesions have not been fully investigated. A randomized comparison of DCB combined with cutting balloon angioplasty vs. cutting balloon angioplasty for SB has never been published. Methods and design The purpose of this study is to explore the superiority of DCB combined with cutting balloon vs. cutting balloon angioplasty for SB after main vessel (MV) drug-eluting stent implantation of true coronary bifurcation lesions. This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial including 140 patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either DCB combined with cutting balloon or cutting balloon angioplasty for SB after MV drug-eluting stent implantation. The primary endpoint is the evaluation of late lumen loss (LLL) of SB at the 9-month follow-up. The secondary endpoints include procedural success during initial hospitalization, LLL of MV at the 9-month follow-up, binary angiographic restenosis in MV and SB at the 9-month follow-up, the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI quantitative flow ratio result ≤ 0.80 for SB at the 9-month follow-up, and major adverse cardiac events during the 24-month follow-up. Conclusions This clinical trial will provide evidence as to whether DCB combined with cutting balloon for SB of true coronary bifurcation lesions is a superior treatment approach. Trial Registration Number ChiCTR2000040475. Dissemination The results of this clinical trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in True coronary bifurcation lesions (n=140). Drug-coated balloon combined with cutting balloon vs. Cutting balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Late lumen loss (LLL) of side branch at 9-month follow-up. A drug-coated balloon combined with a cutting balloon will be evaluated for superiority against cutting balloon angioplasty alone for side branch treatment in true coronary bifurcation lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: