Key result
Optimized low-dose pre-ablation CT protocols cut effective radiation dose ~89% versus standard protocols.
Why the study?
Pre-procedural CT for planning radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias delivers a considerable ionizing radiation dose, prompting the need to develop and validate low-dose left atrium protocols.
Do low-dose CT scanning protocols reduce radiation exposure without compromising image quality in patients with atrial fibrillation prior to catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=68)
Do low-dose CT scanning protocols reduce radiation exposure without compromising image quality in patients with atrial fibrillation prior to catheter ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.83% vs 9.35%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Optimized low-dose pre-ablation CT scanning protocols can reduce average effective radiation dose by 88.7% while maintaining adequate 3D models for electro-anatomic-guided RFA procedures.
Low-dose CT protocols may reduce radiation exposure in AF pre-ablation imaging; leaves open prospective validation of image quality.
(1) Background: Computer tomography (CT) is an imaging modality used in the pre-planning of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) procedure in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. However, it is associated with a considerable ionizing radiation dose for patients. This study aims to develop and validate low-dose CT scanning protocols of the left atrium (LA) for RFA guidance. (2) Methods: 68 patients scheduled for RFA of atrial fibrillation were sequentially assigned to four groups of ECG-gated scanning protocols, based on the set tube current (TC): Group A (n = 20, TC = 33 mAs), Group B (n = 18, TC = 67 mAs), Group C (n = 10, TC = 135 mAs), and control Group D (n = 20, TC = 600 mAs). We used a 256-row multidetector CT with body weight-dependent tube voltage of 80 kVp (<70 kg), 100 kVp (70−90 kg), and 120 kVp (>90 kg). We evaluated scanning parameters including radiation dose, total scanning procedure time and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). (3) Results: The average effective radiation dose (ED) was lower in Group A in comparison to Group B, C and D (0.83 (0.76−1.10), 1.55 (1.36−1.67), 2.91 (2.32−2.96) and 9.35 (8.00−10.04) mSv, p < 0.05). The total amount of contrast media was not significantly different between groups. The mean SNR was 6.5 (5.8−7.3), 7.1 (5.7−8.2), 10.8 (10.1−11.3), and 12.2 (9.9−15.7) for Group A, B, C and D, respectively. The comparisons of SNR in group A vs. B and C vs. D were without significant differences. (4) Conclusions: Optimized pre-ablation CT scanning protocols of the LA can reduce an average ED by 88.7%. Three dimensional (3D) models created with the lowest radiation protocol are useful for the integration of electro-anatomic-guided RFA procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jadczyk et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=68). Low-dose CT scanning protocols vs. Standard CT scanning protocol (tube current 600 mAs) was evaluated on Effective radiation dose (ED) (p=< 0.05). Optimized low-dose pre-ablation CT scanning protocols reduced the average effective radiation dose by 88.7% (0.83 mSv vs 9.35 mSv, p<0.05) compared to standard protocols.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: