Highlights the importance of considering aortic stenosis as a systemic disease involving the ventricle, valve, and vasculature, particularly using valvuloarterial impedance to predict outcomes post-TAVR.
Valvuloarterial impedance may refine post-TAVR LV prognosis; leaves open whether vascular-targeted interventions alter remodeling or outcomes.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the elderly and it causes significant morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is also highly prevalent in elderly patients with AS, and AS patients with hypertension have worse outcomes. Accurate assessment of AS severity and understanding its relationship with arterial compliance has become increasingly important as the options for valve management, particularly transcatheter interventions, have grown. The parameters used for quantifying stenosis severity have traditionally mainly focused on the valve itself. However, AS is now recognized as a systemic disease involving aging ventricles and stiff arteries rather than one limited solely to the valve. Over the last decade, valvuloarterial impedance, a measure of global ventricular load, has contributed to our understanding of the pathophysiology and course of AS in heterogeneous patients, even when segregated by symptoms and severity. This review summarizes our growing understanding of the interplay between ventricle, valve, and vessel, with a particular emphasis on downstream vascular changes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the role of valvuloarterial impedance in predicting left ventricular changes and prognosis in patients with various transvalvular flow patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwari et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: