Key result
Aortic stenosis is linked to ~28% higher global LV load and systemic vascular resistance.
Why the study?
Aortic stenosis functions as a series circuit with substantial vascular contribution, but quantifying this arterial component has been difficult.
Does simultaneous CMR and applanation tonometry identify differences in ventriculo-arterial coupling between patients with aortic stenosis and healthy elderly controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=40)
No
Does simultaneous CMR and applanation tonometry identify differences in ventriculo-arterial coupling between patients with aortic stenosis and healthy elderly controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 946% vs 740%
p-value: p=0.02
Simultaneous CMR and applanation tonometry can effectively quantify ventriculo-arterial coupling and demonstrate the hemodynamic effects of aortic stiffening and valvular stenosis.
May aid noninvasive load assessment in aortic stenosis; extends CMR-tonometry for ventriculo-arterial coupling quantification.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is no longer considered to be a disease of fixed left ventricular (LV) afterload, but rather, functions as a series circuit, with important contributions from both the valve and vasculature. Patients with AS are typically elderly, with hypertension and a markedly remodelled aorta. The arterial component is sizeable, and yet, quantifying this to-date has been difficult to determine. We compared measurement of aortic pressure, flow and global LV load using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/applanation tonometry (AT) technique to uncouple ventriculo-arterial (VA) interactions. METHODS: 20 healthy elderly patients and 20 with AS underwent a CMR/AT protocol. CMR provided LV volume and aortic flow simultaneously with AT pressure acquisition. Aortic pressure was derived by transformation of the AT waveform. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and global LV load were determined as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Values from both cohorts were compared. RESULTS: ; p = 0.02) were higher in patients with AS, whilst aortic peak flow velocity was lower (38 vs 58 cm/s; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of aortic pressure, flow velocity and global LV load using a simultaneous CMR/AT technique is able to demonstrate the progressive effects of hypertension and aortic stiffening with advanced age and valvular stenosis. This technique may help to better identify future patients at risk of VA coupling mismatch after correction of AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hungerford et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic valve stenosis (n=40). Aortic valve stenosis vs. Healthy elderly adults was evaluated on Global LV load (linear flow, dyne s.cm-3) (p=0.02). Aortic valve stenosis was associated with significantly higher global left ventricular load (946 vs 740 dyne s.cm-3) and systemic vascular resistance compared to healthy elderly adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: