Key result
Right atrial wall FDG uptake is linked to ~168% higher risk of AF recurrence or stroke.
Why the study?
Inflammation is essential in AF pathogenesis and recurrence, but the relationship between atrial inflammatory activity detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT and poor AF prognosis was not well established.
Does right atrial wall positive FDG uptake on PET/CT predict poor prognosis (AF recurrence or new-onset stroke) in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=204)
Does right atrial wall positive FDG uptake on PET/CT predict poor prognosis (AF recurrence or new-onset stroke) in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: HR 2.68 (95% CI 1.10-6.50)
p-value: p=0.03
Right atrial wall inflammation detected by 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after ablation or new-onset stroke.
May support PET/CT for AF risk stratification beyond CHA2DS2-VASc; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been identified to increase stroke risk, even after oral anticoagulants (OACs), and the recurrence rate is high after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). Inflammation is an essential factor in the occurrence and persistence of AF. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an established molecular imaging modality to detect local inflammation. We aimed to investigate the relationship between atrial inflammatory activity and poor prognosis of AF based on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Methods: A total of 204 AF patients including 75 with paroxysmal AF (ParAF) and 129 with persistent AF (PerAF) who underwent PET/CT before treatment were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Clinical data, electrocardiograph (ECG), echocardiography, and cardiac 18F-FDG uptake were collected. Follow-up information was obtained from patient clinical case notes or telephone reviews, with the starting point being the time of PET/CT scan. The follow-up deadline was either the date of AF recurrence after RFCA, new-onset stroke, or May 2023. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify predictors of poor prognosis and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. Results: Median follow-up time was 29 months [interquartile range (IQR), 22–36 months]. Poor prognosis occurred in 52 patients (25.5%), including 34 new-onset stroke patients and 18 recrudescence after RFCA. The poor prognosis group had higher congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years (doubled), diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or thromboembolism (doubled), vascular disease, age 65–74 years, sex category (female) (CHA2DS2-VASc) score [3.0 (IQR, 1.0–3.75) vs. 2.0 (IQR, 1.0–3.0), P=0.01], right atrial (RA) wall maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (4.13±1.82 vs. 3.74±1.58, P=0.04), higher percentage of PerAF [39 (75.0%) vs. 90 (59.2%), P=0.04], left atrial (LA) enlargement [45 (86.5%) vs. 104 (68.4%), P=0.01], and RA wall positive FDG uptake [40 (76.9%) vs. 79 (52.0%), P=0.002] compared with the non-poor prognosis group. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis concluded that only CHA2DS2-VASc score (HR, 1.29; 95% CI: 1.06–1.57; P=0.01) and RA wall positive FDG uptake (HR, 2.68; 95% CI: 1.10–6.50; P=0.03) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions: RA wall FDG positive uptake based on PET/CT is tightly related to AF recurrence after RFCA or new-onset stroke after antiarrhythmic and anticoagulation treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=204). Right atrial wall positive FDG uptake vs. Negative FDG uptake was evaluated on Poor prognosis (AF recurrence after RFCA or new-onset stroke) (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.10-6.50, p=0.03). Right atrial wall positive FDG uptake on PET/CT was significantly associated with poor prognosis, defined as AF recurrence or new-onset stroke (HR 2.68; 95% CI 1.10-6.50; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: