PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2006Circulation288 citationsOpen Access

Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times

View Full Paper
EBElizabeth H. BradleyLCLeslie CurryTWTashonna R. Webster

Key Result

Organizational strategies, including innovative protocols and data feedback, identified across 11 hospitals and 122 staff interviews, enabled median door-to-balloon times of ≤90 minutes.

Key Points

  • The aim is to characterize the experiences of hospitals that significantly improved door-to-balloon times for STEMI treatment.
  • Qualitative study with in-depth interviews (n=122) conducted at 11 hospitals.
  • Hospitals had median door-to-balloon times of <=90 minutes during 2001-2002, showing substantial improvement since 1999.
  • Data analysis was performed using NUD-IST 4 software and the constant comparative method.
  • Identified eight key themes related to improvement practices among hospitals.
  • Themes included commitment to goals, senior management support, and collaborative teams.
  • An organizational culture fostering resilience was also crucial for overcoming challenges.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Clinical and administrative staff (n=122) at 11 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction with median door-to-balloon times ≤90 minutes during 2001-2002
I
Intervention
Qualitative study using in-depth interviews to characterize hospital experiences
O
Outcome
Themes characterizing hospitals' experiences with outstanding improvement in door-to-balloon time

Successful reduction of door-to-balloon times in STEMI requires a combination of explicit goals, strong leadership, innovative protocols, and a collaborative organizational culture.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fewer than half of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated within guideline-recommended door-to-balloon times; however, little information is available about the approaches used by hospitals that have been successful in improving door-to-balloon times to meet guidelines. We sought to characterize experiences of hospitals with outstanding improvement in door-to-balloon time during 1999-2002. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a qualitative study using in-depth interviews (n=122) with clinical and administrative staff at 11 hospitals that were participating with the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction and had median door-to-balloon times of < or =90 minutes during 2001-2002, representing substantial improvement since 1999. Data were organized with the use of NUD-IST 4 (Sage Publications Software) and were analyzed by the constant comparative method of qualitative data analysis. Eight themes characterized hospitals' experiences: commitment to an explicit goal to improve door-to-balloon time motivated by internal and external pressures; senior management support; innovative protocols; flexibility in refining standardized protocols; uncompromising individual clinical leaders; collaborative teams; data feedback to monitor progress and identify problems and successes; and an organizational culture that fostered resilience to challenges or setbacks in improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Several themes characterized the experiences of hospitals that had achieved notable improvements in their door-to-balloon times. By distilling the complex and diverse experiences of organizational change into its essential components, this study provides a foundation for future efforts to elevate clinical performance in the hospital setting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bradley et al. (2006) studied ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=122). Organizational strategies was evaluated on Themes characterizing hospitals' experiences in improving door-to-balloon time. Organizational strategies, including innovative protocols and data feedback, identified across 11 hospitals and 122 staff interviews, enabled median door-to-balloon times of ≤90 minutes.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f9dc057bfcc72645faf7dhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.590133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper