Why the study?
Functional and structural right atrial changes predisposing to typical AFL manifest in P-wave morphology, prompting evaluation of P-wave duration and morphology in paroxysmal versus persistent AFL.
Does P-wave duration differ between patients with paroxysmal and persistent typical atrial flutter?
Does P-wave duration differ between patients with paroxysmal and persistent typical atrial flutter?
Patients with persistent typical atrial flutter exhibit longer P-wave durations than those with paroxysmal atrial flutter, indicating more advanced atrial remodeling.
Longer P-wave duration associated with persistent AFL; hypothesis-generating for remodeling severity, needs prospective validation before clinical use.
Functional and structural changes, the enlargement of the right atrium is the background for the development of typical atrial flutter (AFL). These changes in ECG are manifested in the morphology of the initial part of the P-wave. The aim of the study was to assess the duration and morphology of the P-wave in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AFL. The study population consisted of 131 patients with AFL, 38 women and 93 men aged 66 years (60-72), divided in 62 patients with paroxysmal and 69 with persistent AFL. P-wave duration was measured with an electrophysiological system in all leads at a paper speed of 200 mm/s. The groups did differ in terms of gender (38/24 vs. 55/14, (M/F), p=0.033). Patients with persistent AF had a longer P-wave duration - 175±26.3 ms vs. 159±22.6 ms, p=0.01, and higher creatinine concentration - 1.2±0.60 mg/dl vs. 1.08±0.68 mg/dl, p=0.007. The presence and severity of interatrial conduction block (I-none, II-partial, III-total) was related to age of the patients (60.3±12.1 vs. 64.7±-8.3 vs. 68.9±9.5 years, respectively). Patients with persistent AFL show a longer P-wave compared to paroxysmal AFL, regardless of comorbidities and antiarrhythmic drugs. The arrhythmia-related longer P-wave duration should encourage the clinicians to restore sinus rhythm earlier in order to more effectively maintain it over the long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ŚLIMAK et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: