Why the study?
Functional and structural atrial changes that decrease conduction velocity and prolong P wave duration constitute a substrate for AF, prompting assessment of P wave duration in paroxysmal versus persistent AF.
Does persistent atrial fibrillation increase P wave duration compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does persistent atrial fibrillation increase P wave duration compared to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with significantly prolonged P wave duration compared to paroxysmal AF, reflecting more advanced atrial structural and electrical remodeling.
Functional and structural changes in atrial muscle constitute a substrate for atrial fibrillation. The pathological changes in the left atrium decrease conduction velocity and result in prolongation of the P wave duration. The aim of the study was to assess the duration of the P wave in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. The study group consisted of 119 patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, 57 women and 62 men, aged 65.3+/-9.4 years. There were 65 patients with paroxysmal AF and 54 with persistent AF. In this group the electrical cardioversion was performed. The P wave duration, was measured using electrophysiological system in all leads at paper speed of 200 mm/s. The studied patients did not differ in term of age, gender and comorbidities. The patients with persistent AF had longer P wave duration (159.9+/-22.3 vs 144.6+/-17.2 ms, p<0.001), higher glucose concentration (119.4+/-33.4 vs 108.0+/-24.6 mg/dL, p=0.015). Those results were not influenced by the anti-arrhythmic treatment. The persistent atrial fibrillation shows prolongation of the P wave duration over the paroxysmal form of the arrhythmia, independently to age, gender and anti-arrhythmic medication. The prolongation of the P wave related to persistent arrhythmia should force the physicians to earlier restoration of the sinus rhythm in order to its more successful long term maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Unkell et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: