Key result
Post-telerehabilitation risk factors predict a ~10-fold higher risk of major events in top-tertile HF patients.
Why the study?
Assessing prognosis in HF is of major importance, prompting this study to define predictors of long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization after a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation program.
What are the predictors of long-term cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization in heart failure patients after a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation program?
RCT (n=850)
1:1
Yes
What are the predictors of long-term cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization in heart failure patients after a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation program?
Clinical status, biomarkers, and treatment adherence measured after a 9-week telerehabilitation program can effectively stratify heart failure patients for their 2-year risk of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization.
May aid post-telerehabilitation risk stratification in HF; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Assessing prognosis in heart failure (HF) is of major importance. AIMS: The study aimed to define predictors influencing long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization ("composite outcome") based on clinical status and measurements obtained after a 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) program. METHODS: This analysis is based on the TELEREH-HF (TELEREHabilitation in Heart Failure) multicenter randomized trial that enrolled 850 HF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤40%). Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9-week HCTR plus usual care (experimental arm) or usual care only (control arm) and followed for median (interquartile range [IQR]) 24 (20-24) months for development of the composite outcome. RESULTS: Over 12-24 months of follow-up, 108 (28.1%) patients experienced the composite outcome. The predictors of our composite outcome were: nonischemic etiology of HF, diabetes, higher serum level of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; low carbon dioxide output at peak exercise; high minute ventilation and breathing frequency at maximum effort in cardiopulmonary exercise tests; increase in delta of average heart rate in 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring, lower LVEF, and patients' non-adherence to HCTR. The model discrimination C-index was 0.795 and decreased to 0.755 on validation conducted in the control sample which was not used in derivation. The 2-year risk of the composite outcome was 48% in the top tertile versus 5% in the bottom tertile of the developed risk score. CONCLUSION: Risk factors collected at the end of the 9-week telerehabilitation period performed well in stratifying patients based on their 2-year risk of the composite outcome. Patients in the top tertile had an almost ten-fold higher risk compared to patients in the bottom tertile. Treatment adherence, but not peak VO2 or quality of life, was significantly associated with the outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piotrowicz et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=850). 9-week hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) vs. Usual care only was evaluated on Long-term cardiovascular mortality or HF hospitalization. Risk factors collected after 9-week telerehabilitation stratified heart failure patients, with a 2-year composite outcome risk of 48% in the top tertile versus 5% in the bottom tertile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: