Key result
Transcatheter interventions emerge as complementary treatments for heart failure.
Why the study?
Despite medical management advances, heart failure morbidity and mortality remain high, creating a need for additional treatment modalities to fill clinical gaps.
This review explores the physiology, rationale, and clinical development of non-valvular catheter-based therapies for chronic heart failure.
These therapies should not yet change practice; leaves open their role pending randomized trials.
Despite significant advances in the medical management of patients living with heart failure, there continues to be significant morbidity and mortality associated with the condition. There is a growing need for research and development of additional modalities to fill the management and treatment gaps, reduce hospitalisations and improve the quality of life for patients living with heart failure. In the last decade, there has been a rapid rise in the use of non-valvular catheter-based therapies for the management of chronic heart failure to complement existing guideline-directed management. They target well-defined mechanistic and pathophysiological processes critical to the progression of heart failure including left ventricular remodelling, neurohumoral activation, and congestion. In this review, we will explore the physiology, rationale, and current stages of the clinical development of the existing procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latib et al. (2023) conducted a review in Heart failure. Transcatheter interventions was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: