Why the study?
Does achieving non-inducibility during catheter ablation reduce the recurrence of VT or VF in patients with prior MI?
Does achieving non-inducibility during catheter ablation reduce the recurrence of VT or VF in patients with prior MI?
Achieving non-inducibility of VT at the end of catheter ablation in patients with prior MI is associated with significantly lower recurrence of VT or VF.
Non-inducibility may support ablation endpoint selection in post-MI VT; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background Catheter ablation can reduce episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI). However, the optimal endpoint of the ablation procedure remains unclear. Methods Fifty‐one consecutive patients who received catheter ablation for VT after MI were included. The procedures targeted the isthmus of all the induced, sustained VTs. When the patients with induced VTs were hemodynamically stable, radiofrequency energy was delivered at the mid‐diastolic potential recording site during VT. When the patients with VTs were hemodynamically unstable, the critical channel was identified at the delayed potential recording site, showing a good pace map, with a long stimulus‐QRS interval. We delivered radiofrequency energy along the identified isthmus and across the exit of the circuit. Results At the end of the procedure, all VTs became non‐inducible in 30 patients (59%) and some VTs were inducible in 21 patients (41%). During a mean of 40±29 months of follow‐up, no VT or ventricular fibrillation recurred in 24 patients (80%) in the non‐inducible group and in 12 patients (57%) in the inducible group, respectively ( P =0.03). The identification of the channel during VT mapping tended to associate with no recurrence, although the difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.2). Fourteen patients (27%) died during the follow‐up period, mostly due to non‐cardiac causes. Conclusions The catheter ablation targeting the isthmus of prior‐MIVT and non‐inducibility at the end of the procedure can provide a satisfactory follow‐up result.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukunaga et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: