Why the study?
To elucidate a safer method to enlarge lesion size using the TactiFlex SE irrigation catheter in temperature-control mode.
Does increasing ablation duration or using half-normal saline irrigation safely enlarge lesion size using a temperature-controlled flexible-tip irrigation catheter in swine models?
Does increasing ablation duration or using half-normal saline irrigation safely enlarge lesion size using a temperature-controlled flexible-tip irrigation catheter in swine models?
To safely achieve larger ablation lesions using a temperature-controlled flexible-tip catheter, extending the duration of radiofrequency application is recommended over using half-normal saline irrigation, which increases the risk of steam-pops.
Longer ablation duration may be preferable to half-normal saline irrigation in swine models; leaves open translation to human practice.
Background & Objectives The TactiFlex TM SE irrigation catheter installs a laser-cut flexible tip with a thermocouple embedded 0.3mm from the tip, being used with temperature-control mode. We aimed to elucidate a safer method to enlarge the lesion size using this catheter. Methods RF-applications were performed at a range of powers (35W, 40W, and 45W), CFs (10g/20g), and durations (60s, 120s, and 180s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation with normal saline irrigation (NS-irrigation) and Half NS-irrigation (HNS-irrigation) in an ex-vivo model (Step 1). Further, similar RF-applications of 35W/40W/45W for 60s/120s/180 in NS-irrigation and 35W/40W for 60s/120s/180s in HNS-irrigation) were performed in 4 swine (Step 2). Lesion characteristics and the incidence of steam-pops were assessed. Results In this ex-vivo experiment, 47(16.3%) steam-pops (13 in NS-irrigation vs 34 in HNS-irrigation, p=0.001) were observed in 288 lesions. In NS-irrigation group, the most aggressive setting (45W/180s, n=7/13, 54%) played a large part of steam-pop occurrence. Lesion size proportionally increased with longer ablation duration, but not with HNS-irrigation. The optimal cut-off of %impedance-drop to predict steam-pops was 20% with the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 78.3%, 80.6%, 43.4%, and 95.1%, respectively. In the in-vivo experiment, steam-pops were not observed with NS-irrigation (n=0/35), but were with HNS-irrigation (6/21, 29%). Lesion size proportionally increased with longer ablation duration, but not with HNS-irrigation partially because of the higher incidence of temperature-guard use (p=0.07). The optimal cut-off of %impedance-drop to predict steam-pops was 24% with the sensitivity= 83.0%, specificity=52.0%, PPV= 17.2%, and NPV= 96.3%, respectively, but 20% may be used with a safety margin. Conclusions Although this novel catheter is generally safe, increasing ablation duration instead of using HNS-irrigation may be recommended for larger lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takigawa et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: