Compares half-normal saline and normal saline irrigation effects on ablation lesions, indicating limited advantages with temperature-controlled methods.
ABSTRACT Background Half-normal saline (HNS) irrigation increases radiofrequency (RF) lesion size during power-controlled ablation by augmenting current delivery to tissue. Whether this benefit persists with temperature-controlled ablation, which modulates power delivery based on catheter tip temperature, remains unknown. Objectives This study sought to compare lesion characteristics using HNS versus normal saline (NS) irrigation with power-controlled and temperature-controlled open-irrigated catheters in an ex vivo model. Methods RF applications were delivered to left ventricular porcine tissue using a power- and temperature-controlled irrigated catheter with NS and HNS irrigation. Lesions were performed at 10 grams contact force perpendicular to tissue. Temperature-controlled ablation used manufacturer-preset maximum temperature cutoffs of 50°C at 30W and 55°C at 50W. Results Among 104 lesions analyzed, HNS irrigation with the power-controlled catheter produced larger lesions at 30Wx30 seconds compared to NS (depth: 7.5±1.0 vs 6.5±0.6 mm, P=0.0005; width: 10.5±1.1 vs 9.4±1.0 mm, P=0.005). However, no difference in lesion dimensions was observed with the temperature-controlled catheter using HNS versus NS at 30W (depth: 6.1±0.4 vs 6.2±0.7 mm, P=0.44; width: 9.4±0.7 vs 9.6±1.2 mm, P=0.23) or 50W (depth: 7.2±0.7 vs 7.5±0.8 mm, P=0.35; width: 10.9±1.3 vs 11.8±1.6 mm, P=0.19). With HNS, the temperature-controlled catheter showed reduced average power delivery (30W: 23.3±5.4 vs 27.1±4.6 W, P<0.05) and increased irrigation flow rates compared to NS, likely due to temperature cutoff enforcement. Fewer steam pops were observed with the temperature-controlled versus power-controlled catheter using HNS (5% vs 23%, P=0.09). Conclusions Unlike power-controlled ablation, HNS irrigation does not increase lesion size with temperature-controlled ablation. Enforcement of maximum temperature cutoffs reduces actual power delivery, blunting the current augmentation benefit of HNS irrigation while potentially improving safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: