Key result
Half-normal saline irrigation for VA ablation shows similar 30-day adverse events versus normal saline.
Why the study?
Half-normal saline irrigated RF ablation can increase lesion size and reduce sodium delivery compared with normal saline, but it could increase risks of steam pops and lesion-related complications.
Does half-normal saline irrigation during radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias have an acceptable safety profile and acute success rate compared to normal saline?
Observational (n=935)
Does half-normal saline irrigation during radiofrequency ablation of ventricular arrhythmias have an acceptable safety profile and acute success rate compared to normal saline?
Half-normal saline irrigation during radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmias has an acceptable safety profile and acute success rate comparable to normal saline, while reducing the sodium load.
Supports comparable safety for half-normal saline irrigation in ventricular arrhythmia ablation; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
AIMS: Failure of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is often due to inadequate lesion size. Irrigated RF ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) has the potential to increase lesion size and reduce sodium delivery to the patient if the same volume of RF irrigant were used for normal saline (NS) and HNS but could increase risks related to steam pops and lesion size. This study aims to assess periprocedural complications and acute ablation outcome of ventricular arrhythmias ablation with HNS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective assessment of outcomes was performed in 1024 endocardial and/or epicardial RF ablation procedures in 935 consecutive patients (median age 64 years, 71.2% men, 73.4% cardiomyopathy, 47.2% sustained ventricular tachycardia). Half-normal saline was selected at the discretion of the treating physician. Radiofrequency ablation power was generally titrated to a ≤15 Ω impedance fall with intracardiac echocardiography monitoring. Half-normal saline was used in 900 (87.9%) and NS in 124 (12.1%) procedures. Any adverse event within 30 days occurred in 13.0% of patients treated with HNS RF ablation including 4 (0.4%) strokes/transient ischaemic attacks and 34 (3.8%) pericardial effusions requiring treatment (mostly related to epicardial access). Two steam pops with perforation required surgical repair (0.2%). Patients who received NS irrigation had less severe disease and arrhythmias. In multivariable models, adverse events and acute success of the procedure were not related to the type of irrigation. CONCLUSION: Half-normal saline irrigation RF ablation with power guided by impedance fall and intracardiac echocardiography has an acceptable rate of complications and acute ablation success while administering half of the saline load expected for NS irrigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasegawa et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Ventricular arrhythmias (n=935). Half-normal saline irrigation vs. Normal saline irrigation was evaluated on Periprocedural complications (any adverse event within 30 days) and acute ablation outcome. Half-normal saline irrigation for ventricular arrhythmia radiofrequency ablation had a 13.0% 30-day adverse event rate, which was not significantly different from normal saline irrigation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: