N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker of long-term interventional success after radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (B-type natriuretic peptide; BNP) are secreted by the heart mainly in response to myocardial stretch induced by volume load. The aim of the present study was to determine the time course of the N-terminal prohormone forms of ANP (NT-proANP) and BNP (NT-proBNP) in patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias. Serial blood samples were taken from 13 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias undergoing RF ablation and from 13 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Blood was taken before ablation (day 0, baseline), and at day one and day 120 after ablation. Levels of NT-proANP were significantly higher before RF ablation (4862+/-726 pmol/l) as compared to day one (2021+/-220 pmol/l) and day 120 after RF ablation (2470+/-349 pmol/l) (with p<0.01 on day one and p<0.05 on day 120; n=13). The size of the left atrium decreased from 41.0+/-5.5 mm before ablation to 34.9+/-5.9 mm (n=13; p<0.05) on day 120 as measured by M-mode echocardiography. Levels of NT-proBNP showed comparable values before and on day one and day 120 after ablation and were not significantly elevated as compared to healthy controls. NT-proANP levels are increased in patients presenting with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and decrease one day after radiofrequency catheter ablation, possibly reflecting a transient reduction of ANP secretion from injured myocardial cells. Lower NT-proANP levels in the long-term time course may result from reduction of atrial volume load and reconstitution of atrial architecture after successful treatment of supraventricular tachycardias. NT-proANP may serve as a useful laboratory marker to describe the long-term interventional success after RF ablation.