Key result
Xiaomi Mi Band 5 HR monitoring strongly correlates with professional medical equipment in healthy individuals.
Why the study?
Cervical spinal cord injury impairs the autonomic nervous system and cardiovascular adaptation during rehabilitation, prompting evaluation of low-cost wearable sensors for heart rate monitoring during upper limb activities.
Is the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 wristband feasible and accurate for heart rate monitoring compared to professional medical equipment during upper limb training in spinal cord injured patients?
Observational (n=8)
Is the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 wristband feasible and accurate for heart rate monitoring compared to professional medical equipment during upper limb training in spinal cord injured patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.921 (static), r = 0.941 (dynamic)
p-value: p=<0.01
A low-cost wearable sensor (Xiaomi Mi Band 5) is feasible for monitoring heart rate during upper limb rehabilitation in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.
Strong correlation supports low-cost HR monitoring in healthy subjects; leaves open validation during upper-limb training in spinal cord injury.
(1) Background: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have impairment in the autonomic nervous system, reflected in the cardiovascular adaption level during the performance of upper limb (UL) activities carried out in the rehabilitation process. This adaption level could be measured from the heart rate (HR) by means of wearable technologies. Therefore, the objective was to analyze the feasibility of using Xiaomi Mi Band 5 wristband (XMB5) for HR monitoring in these patients during the performance of UL activities; (2) Methods: The HR measurements obtained from XMB5 were compared to those obtained by the professional medical equipment Nonin LifeSense II capnograph and pulse oximeter (NLII) in static and dynamic conditions. Then, four healthy people and four cervical SCI patients performed a UL training based on six experimental sessions; (3) Results: the correlation between the HR measurements from XMB5 and NLII devices was strong and positive in healthy people (r = 0.921 and r = 0.941 (p < 0.01) in the static and dynamic conditions, respectively). Then, XMB5 was used within the experimental sessions, and the HR oscillation range measured was significantly higher in healthy individuals than in patients; (4) Conclusions: The XMB5 seems to be feasible for measuring the HR in this biomedical application in SCI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salas-Monedero et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Cervical spinal cord injury (n=8). Xiaomi Mi Band 5 wristband (XMB5) vs. Nonin LifeSense II capnograph and pulse oximeter (NLII) was evaluated on Correlation between HR measurements from XMB5 and NLII devices (r = 0.921 (static), r = 0.941 (dynamic), p=<0.01). Heart rate monitoring using the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 showed strong positive correlation with professional medical equipment in healthy individuals (r=0.921 static, r=0.941 dynamic; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: