Key result
CardioMEMS is cost-effective vs standard care for NYHA class III HF at ~$45,000 per QALY.
Why the study?
Is the CardioMEMS HF System cost-effective compared to standard of care in NYHA class III heart failure patients?
Is the CardioMEMS HF System cost-effective compared to standard of care in NYHA class III heart failure patients?
Effect estimate: ICER $44,832 per QALY
The CardioMEMS HF System is a cost-effective intervention for NYHA class III heart failure patients, with an ICER of $44,832 per QALY over a 5-year horizon.
May inform reimbursement decisions in NYHA III HF; leaves open prospective validation with contemporary therapies.
Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality in the United States and presents a substantial economic burden. A recently approved implantable wireless pulmonary artery pressure remote monitor, the CardioMEMS HF System, has been shown to be effective in reducing hospitalizations among New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III HF patients. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of this remote monitoring technology compared to standard of care treatment for HF. A Markov cohort model relying on the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in NYHA Class III Heart Failure Patients) clinical trial for mortality and hospitalization data, published sources for cost data, and a mix of CHAMPION data and published sources for utility data, was developed. The model compares outcomes over 5 years for implanted vs standard of care patients, allowing patients to accrue costs and utilities while they remain alive. Sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty in input parameters. The CardioMEMS HF System was found to be cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $44,832 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analysis found the model was sensitive to the device cost and to whether mortality benefits were sustained, although there were no scenarios in which the cost/QALY exceeded $100,000. Compared with standard of care, the CardioMEMS HF System was cost-effective when leveraging trial data to populate the model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmier et al. (2017) studied Heart failure (NYHA class III). CardioMEMS HF System vs. Standard of care treatment was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (ICER $44,832 per QALY). The CardioMEMS HF System was cost-effective compared to standard of care for NYHA class III heart failure, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $44,832 per quality-adjusted life year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: