Why the study?
Does basic or intensive education and support improve time to first major event, quality of life, and costs in patients with heart failure compared to care as usual?
Does basic or intensive education and support improve time to first major event, quality of life, and costs in patients with heart failure compared to care as usual?
The COACH study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of basic versus intensive education and support compared to usual care on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in heart failure patients.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaarsma et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: