Why the study?
Does basic or intensive education and support improve time to first major event, quality of life, and costs in patients with heart failure compared to care as usual?
Does basic or intensive education and support improve time to first major event, quality of life, and costs in patients with heart failure compared to care as usual?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The COACH study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of basic versus intensive education and support compared to usual care on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in heart failure patients.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaarsma et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: