Key result
WeChat-based education and rehab improves 3-month physical performance vs control in post-PCI ACS patients.
Why the study?
Online care via WeChat offers an opportunity to improve physical recovery and quality of life in cardio/cerebrovascular diseases, particularly during periods like COVID-19, but its effect after PCI for ACS needed evaluation.
Does a WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program improve physical performance and quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=180)
Open-label
Block randomization (block size four)
No
Does a WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program improve physical performance and quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention?
p-value: p=0.030
May support WeChat-based rehab for post-PCI physical gains; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in larger trials.
WeChat provides the chance for online caring program to improve physical recovery and quality of life (QoL) in patients with cardio/cerebral vascular diseases, especially in special period such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread time. This study intended to evaluate the influence of the WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program (WERP) on physical performance and QoL in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Totally, 180 patients with ACS after PCI were randomized to the WERP (N = 90) and control care (CC) (N = 90) groups, then received corresponding caring program for 3 months. Short physical performance battery (SPPB) score, 6-minute walking distance (6MWT), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score, and EuroQol-5 Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) score were assessed at discharge, month (M)1, M2, and M3, respectively. Our study showed that SPPB score at M1 ( P = 0.029), M2 (P = 0.048), and M3 (P = 0.030) was higher in WERP group than in CC group. Besides, 6MWT at M1 (P = 0.026), M2 (P = 0.023), and M3 (P = 0.041) were longer in WERP group than in CC group. Finally, EQ-5D score at M1 (P = 0.022) and M3 (P = 0.023) was lower, while EQ-VAS score at M1 (P = 0.020), M2 (P = 0.013), and M3 (P = 0.039) was higher in WERP group than in CC group. Subgroup analyses further showed that patients with baseline SPPB score ≤ 9 benefited more from WERP. Conclusively, WERP could be an option to improve physical performance and QoL in patients with ACS after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) post-PCI (n=180). WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program (WERP) vs. Control care (CC) was evaluated on Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score at 3 months (p=0.030). The WeChat-based education and rehabilitation program significantly improved physical performance at 3 months (p=0.030) compared to control care in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: