Key result
High CYP2D6-determined metoprolol exposure post-MI shows no MACE benefit over low exposure.
Why the study?
The clinical benefit of up-titrating metoprolol to a guideline-recommended target dose after MI remains unknown.
Does higher metoprolol exposure determined by CYP2D6 genotype reduce MACE or CV death in patients treated with metoprolol after MI?
Observational (n=1,554)
No
Does higher metoprolol exposure determined by CYP2D6 genotype reduce MACE or CV death in patients treated with metoprolol after MI?
Genetically determined variation in metoprolol exposure via CYP2D6 does not significantly impact cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with metoprolol after myocardial infarction.
No support for CYP2D6-guided metoprolol dosing post-MI; leaves open whether exposure affects outcomes in larger cohorts.
PURPOSE: The clinical benefit of up-titration of metoprolol to a guideline-recommended target dose after myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. Our aim was to investigate whether variation in metoprolol exposure determined by cytochrome p450 enzyme 2D6 (CYP2D6) influences the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cardiovascular death (CV death) among patients treated with metoprolol after MI. METHOD: This Mendelian randomization study was performed using individual-level data from 1554 patients treated with metoprolol after an acute MI. CYPD26 genotype was applied as a binary genetic instrument assigning patients into two metoprolol exposure groups: CYP2D6 normal metabolizers (NM) (low exposure) and CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers (IM + PM) (high exposure). The null hypothesis of no association between the CYP2D6 metabolizer subgroup and MACE or CV death was tested using the Cox proportional hazards model. All-cause mortality and individual components of MACE were included as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 879 (56.6%) patients were classified as NM and 675 (43.4%) as IM + PM. During the 3-year follow-up, 56 patients (6.4%) in the NM group had an outcome of MACE, and 24 (2.7%) patients died from CV disease. Corresponding frequency in the IM + PM group was 47 (7.0%) and 22 (3.3%), respectively. There was no association between genotype and MACE [unadjusted HR 1.12 (CI 0.76, 1.65)] or CV death [unadjusted HR 1.20 (CI 0.67, 2.14)], or between the CYP2D6 group and any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with metoprolol after MI, variation in metoprolol exposure determined by CYP2D6 did not impact the occurrence of cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruun et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=1,554). High metoprolol exposure (CYP2D6 intermediate and poor metabolizers) vs. Low metoprolol exposure (CYP2D6 normal metabolizers) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.76, 1.65, p=0.57). In patients treated with metoprolol after myocardial infarction, high metoprolol exposure determined by CYP2D6 genotype did not significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared to low exposure (HR 1.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: