Why the study?
Should patients with acute pulmonary embolism receive NOACs over conventional heparin/vitamin K antagonist regimens, and how should they be managed (inpatient vs outpatient, duration)?
Should patients with acute pulmonary embolism receive NOACs over conventional heparin/vitamin K antagonist regimens, and how should they be managed (inpatient vs outpatient, duration)?
NOACs offer a consistent efficacy and safety profile for the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism across various patient subgroups compared to conventional therapy.
May support NOAC consideration across PE subgroups; leaves open optimal duration and setting pending higher-level evidence.
INTRODUCTION: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a relatively common cardiopulmonary emergency that is a major cause of hospitalization and morbidity and is the primary cause of mortality associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). During the last decade, one of the biggest changes in the management of PE has been the approval of four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) for the treatment of PE and deep vein thrombosis and secondary prevention of VTE. Areas covered: This article reviews the evolving management of PE in the NOAC era and addresses three fundamental questions: who should receive NOACs over conventional heparin/vitamin K antagonist regimens for the treatment of acute PE; should patients be treated as inpatients or outpatients; and how long should patients be treated to reduce the risk of recurrence? Expert commentary: The management of PE is changing. NOACs provide new anticoagulant treatment options for patients with PE, based on Phase III clinical study results. The consistent efficacy and safety profile of NOACs across many PE patient subgroups, including the elderly, fragile patients, those with active cancer and high-risk (right ventricular dysfunction) patients, suggests NOAC use will increase among these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luke Howard (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: