Why the study?
Does time-series analysis of heart rate variability accurately reflect dynamic changes in cardiac vagal tone during autonomic interventions in dogs?
Does time-series analysis of heart rate variability accurately reflect dynamic changes in cardiac vagal tone during autonomic interventions in dogs?
Time-series analysis of the R-R interval can provide a dynamic and noninvasive index of cardiac vagal tone, revealing that high levels of vagal tone remain during exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Time-series HRV analysis may index vagal tone in canine models; leaves open translation to human autonomic research.
A time-series analysis of heart rate variability was evaluated as a marker of cardiac vagal tone using well-characterized autonomic interventions. Heart period (R-R interval) was recorded in 14 mongrel dogs from which the amplitude of the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (0.24-1.04 Hz) was determined. Exercise elicited significant (P less than 0.01) reductions in the index of vagal tone (control 6.3 +/- 0.3 ln ms2 vs. exercise 2.4 +/- 0.4 ln ms2) that were accompanied by significant (P less than 0.01) increases in heart rate (control 123.1 +/- 5 vs. exercise 201.0 +/- 7.7 beats/min). The vagal tone index remained greater than 0 throughout exercise. After propranolol HCl pretreatment, the vagal tone index rapidly decreased toward zero (control 6.2 +/- 0.5; exercise 0.7 +/- 0.3 ln ms2), despite significantly lower increases in heart rate (control 109.3 +/- 4.2; exercise 178.0 +/- 7.6 beats/min). Atropine given during exercise evoked significantly greater increases in heart rate in the control (+48.7 +/- 7.9 beats/min) vs. propranolol (+14.2 +/- 6.7 beats/min) conditions. These data suggest that 1) high levels of cardiac vagal tone remain during exercise; 2) vagal withdrawal is largely responsible for the heart rate increase after beta-adrenergic receptor blockade; and 3) time-series analysis of the R-R interval can provide a dynamic and noninvasive index of cardiac vagal tone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billman et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: