Key result
Double cryoenergy application in a piglet model caused minor coronary artery injury in 2 of 29 lesions and produced ventricular lesions deeper than atrial lesions (4.06 vs 3.58 mm, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Double cryoenergy application was introduced into clinical practice due to single-application inferiority to RFA, but experience regarding efficacy and coronary artery damage was limited.
Does double cryoenergy application create effective lesion volumes and what is the risk of coronary artery damage in a growing myocardium model?
Does double cryoenergy application create effective lesion volumes and what is the risk of coronary artery damage in a growing myocardium model?
Double cryoenergy application in a growing myocardium piglet model creates effective lesions but can cause subclinical minor coronary artery wall injury detectable only by histology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Minor coronary injury risk in piglet model warrants histologic caution in immature hearts; leaves open translation to pediatric ablation.
INTRODUCTION: Cryoenergy is accepted as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in childen for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia substrates. Single cryoenergy application has been shown to be inferior to RFA. Double cryoenergy application has therefore been introduced into clinical practice, but experience concerning efficacy is limited. Coronary artery stenosis has been reported as serious complication after RFA for arrhythmia substrates but not after single cryoablation. The purpose of the study was to assess lesion volume (efficacy) and risk of coronary artery damage (safety), late, that is, 6 months, after double cryoenergy application in a piglet model. METHODS: Two sequential cycles of cryoenergy were delivered at -75°C for 4 minutes at the atrioventricular groove in five piglets. Animals were restudied after 6 months by coronary angiography and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS). Ablation lesions were examined histologically and lesion volume was determined by three-dimensional morphometric analysis. RESULTS: for ventricular lesions (P > .05). Ventricular lesions, 4.06 ± 1.05 mm, were significantly deeper than atrial lesions, 3.58 ± 0.78 mm, (P < .05). In two of the 29 lesions, cryoenergy induced minor coronary artery injury with mild medial and adventitial thickening as well as minimal intimal proliferation, which had neither been detected by coronary angiography nor by ICUS. CONCLUSION: Late after double cryoenergy application at growing myocardium, subclinical minor affection of the coronary artery wall could be detected with minimal intimal proliferation. As lifetime sequelae of this finding remains unknown, further studies are warranted to address safety of repeated cycles of cryoenergy application for tachycardia substrates in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2019) studied Growing myocardium (piglet model) (n=5). Double cryoenergy application was evaluated on Lesion volume and risk of coronary artery damage. Double cryoenergy application in a piglet model caused minor coronary artery injury in 2 of 29 lesions and produced ventricular lesions deeper than atrial lesions (4.06 vs 3.58 mm, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: