Key result
Typical atrial flutter ablation shows similar tachyarrhythmia recurrence to atypical flutter after prior valvular surgery.
Why the study?
Surgical scars cause conduction delays and obstacles facilitating AFL, prompting investigation into outcomes and predictors of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after AFL catheter ablation in patients with prior cardiac surgery for VHD.
What are the predictors of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial flutter in patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease?
Cohort (n=72)
Yes
What are the predictors of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial flutter in patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 28.9% vs 37%
p-value: p=0.473
In patients with prior valvular heart surgery undergoing atrial flutter ablation, concomitant AF, chronic kidney disease, and left atrial diameter are independent predictors of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia.
No difference by flutter type after ablation; leaves open whether targeting concomitant AF, CKD, or LA size reduces recurrence in this population.
Background: Surgical scars cause an intra-atrial conduction delay and anatomical obstacles that facilitate the perpetuation of atrial flutter (AFL). This study aimed to investigate the outcome and predictor of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation in patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease (VHD) who presented with AFL. Methods: Seventy-two patients with prior cardiac surgery for VHD who underwent AFL ablation were included. The patients were categorized into a typical AFL group ( n = 45) and an atypical AFL group ( n = 27). The endpoint was the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia during follow-up. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictor of recurrence. Results: No significant difference was found in the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia between the two groups. Patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) had a higher recurrence of typical AFL compared with those without AF (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.012). In subgroup analysis, typical AFL patients with concomitant AF had a higher incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia than those without it (53 vs. 14%, P = 0.006). Regarding patients without AF, the typical AFL group had a lower recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia than the atypical AFL group (14 vs. 40%, P = 0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that chronic kidney disease (CKD) and left atrial diameter (LAD) were independent predictors of recurrence. Conclusions: In our study cohort, concomitant AF was associated with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. CKD and LAD independently predicted recurrence after AFL ablation in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery for VHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chou et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial flutter in patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease (n=72). Catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter vs. Catheter ablation for atypical atrial flutter was evaluated on Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (p=0.473). In patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease, there was no significant difference in atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after ablation between typical (28.9%) and atypical (37.0%) atrial flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: