PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1973Circulation Research402 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Passive Elastic Stiffness for Isolated Heart Muscle and the Intact Heart

View Full Paper
IMI. MirskyWPWilliam W. Parmley

Structured PICO

P
Population
8 normal canine hearts, 5 infarcted canine hearts, 7 isolated cat papillary muscles, 13 normal human patients, 7 patients with inappropriate hypertrophy, and 6 patients with congestive cardiomyopathy
I
Intervention
Evaluation of elastic stiffness (dσ/dε) and stiffness constant (k) using stress-strain and pressure-volume relationships
C
Comparator
Comparison between normal, infarcted, hypertrophied, and cardiomyopathic hearts
O
Outcome
Elastic stiffness and stiffness constant (k)surrogate

The stiffness constant (k) derived from stress-strain relationships is a sensitive metric for detecting changes in left ventricular stiffness due to infarction, hypertrophy, and cardiomyopathy.

Abstract

A sensitive method was developed for detecting stiffness changes in the left ventricle. Stress-strain relationships (σ--ε) were obtained in the form dσ/dε = kσ + c from published studies on eight normal canine hearts, five infarcted canine hearts, and seven isolated cat papillary muscles. Utilizing pressure-volume relationships, the elastic stiffness (dσ/dε) and the stiffness constant ( k ) were also evaluated in patients with normal ventricles, inappropriate hypertrophy, and congestive cardiomyopathy. The k values were 35.0 ± 1.7 (isolated muscle, 30°C), 37.3 ± 1.9 (normal canine, 23°C), and 23.9 (infarcted). For the patient groups, k and the passive elastic stiffness were 15.8 ± 0.3 and 249 ± 22.4 g/cm 2 for 13 normal patients, 26.4 ± 1.7 and 286 ± 32.0 g/cm 2 for 7 patients with inappropriate hypertrophy, and 20.1 ± 1.2 and 1360 ± 209 g/cm 2 for 6 patients with congestive cardiomyopathy. The results indicate that (1) k is sensitive to stiffness changes due to infarction, (2) hypertrophy causes an increase in the value of k although elastic stiffness remains within normal limits, and (3) k for the intact human heart is lower than it is for isolated muscle.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mirsky et al. (1973) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10dae1acd1dbe064648363https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.33.2.233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Relation of Ultrastructure to Function in the Intact Heart: Sarcomere Structure Relative to Pressure Volume Curves of Intact Left Ventricles of Dog and Cat1966 · 241 citations
  2. 2Fiber Orientation in the Canine Left Ventricle during Diastole and Systole1969 · 1,452 citations
  3. 3Effects of increasing left ventricular filling pressure in patients with acute myocardial infarction1970 · 151 citations
  4. 4Early Increase in Left Ventricular Compliance after Myocardial Infarction1972 · 166 citations
  5. 5Effect of Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Myocardial Infarction on Left Ventricular Compliance in Man1972 · 346 citations